Metropolitan Property Holdings Ltd v Finegold
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1975 |
| Court | Divisional Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
30 cases
-
R v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions and Another, ex parte. Spath Holme Ltd
...Properties v Devlin (1970) 21 P and CR 689, 691; Tormes Ltd v Landau [1971] 1 QB 261 at 267; Metropolitan Properties v Finegold [1975] 1 WLR 349, 352). In default of agreement between the parties, the fair rent is assessed by the rent officers, and, on appeal by rent assessment committees......
-
Richard Walter Morrison-low V. The Executors Of Thomas Herbert Paterson
...overall. There is a distinction between a premium for scarcity and a premium for special amenity (Metropolitan Holdings Ltd v Finegold [1975] 1 WLR 349.) There could in theory be a perfectly balanced market with equal numbers overall of lessors and bidders. In such a market, there could be ......
-
Curtis v London Rent Assessment Committee
...scarcity, the Chairwoman referred to the test of Lord Widgery CJ, with which Mais and Croom-Johnson JJ had agreed, in Metropolitan Property Holdings Ltd. v. Finegold & Ors [1975] 1 WLR 349, DC, at 353–4, that it must be taken over a broad area, not just the immediate locality. She and her f......
-
Western Heritable Investment Company Limited V. Olivia Hunter
...the Spath Holme case ... and as Lord Widgery C.J. analysed it as long ago as 1975 in Metropolitan Property Holdings Ltd. v. Finegold [1975] 1 W.L.R. 349, 351-353 (see also B.T.E. Limited v. Merseyside and Cheshire Rent Assessment Committee (1991) 24 H.L.R. 514, 516-517, per Hutchison J. and......
Request a trial to view additional results