Michael John Murphy Appellant Against HM Advocate
| Jurisdiction | Scotland |
| Neutral Citation | 2007 SCCR 532 |
| Year | 2007 |
| Date | 2007 |
| Court | Unspecified Court (Scotland) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 cases
-
George Brodie V. Her Majesty's Advocate
...of a crime should be asked if he sees that person in the court. If he does, he should be asked to point him out (Murphy v HM Adv 2007 SCCR 532, para [90]). Dock identification evidence is not per se inadmissible; nor is it an infringement of the accused's rights under article 6 (Holland v H......
-
N.c. V. Her Majesty's Advocate
...Bruce v HM Advocate 1936 JC 93, Stewart v HM Advocate 1980 JC 103, Holland v HM Advocate 2003 SCCR 616 at para 27, Murphy v HM Advocate 2007 SCCR 532 at para 90. Where the witness has not previously been asked to make an identification at an identification parade and the witness does not cl......
-
Greg Robson Against Her Majesty's Advocate
...of a crime should be asked if he sees that person in the court. If he does, he should be asked to point him out (Murphy v HM Adv 2007 SCCR 532, para [90]). Dock identification evidence is not per se inadmissible; nor is it an infringement of the accused’s rights under article 6 (Holland v H......
-
Her Majesty's Advocate V. A R K+a R
...could not cure it, he would have a duty to desert the diet. The loss of lines of inquiry was not sufficient (eg Murphy v HM Advocate 2007 SCCR 532, Lord Bonomy at para [43], Lord Osborne at paras [51]-[53]) as there could be clear and forceful directions from the trial judge (eg ibid, Lord ......
Request a trial to view additional results