Micklefield v SAC Technology Ltd
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 21 March 1990 |
| Date | 21 March 1990 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 cases
-
Giovanni Mallone v BPB Industries Plc
...if it were in breach of its own contract of employment, and in this respect he referred to a decision of Mr John Mowbray QC in Micklefield v. SAC Technology Ltd [1990] 1 WLR 1002. It is unnecessary for the purpose of this appeal for this court to consider whether that submission was correct......
-
Tesco Stores Ltd v Simon Pook and Others
...their obligations unless the party was in breach of a duty owed to the other contracting party. This decision was considered in Micklefield –v—SAC Technology Ltd. [1990] IRLR 218 (John Mowbray QC). This too involved a Share Option Scheme which provided that the option could not be exercised......
-
John McCarthy v McCarthy & Stone Plc
...employee by virtue of being wrongfully dismissed by the Defendant: see for example Thompson v Asda-MFI Group [1988] Ch 241 and Micklefield v SAC Technology Ltd [1990] 1 WLR 1002 and compare Levett v Biotrace [1999] ICR 818. 21 Thus he submits that if the Remuneration Committee exercise thei......
-
Mr A Gallagher v Ponticelli UK Ltd: 4107416/2020
...Respondent submitted that Rule 3.5(b) is an exemption clause of the type referred to in the case of Micklefield v SAC Technology Ltd [1990] 1 W.L.R. 1002. The Respondent submits that, if the right to participate in the SIP transferred to the Respondent, then the benefit of the exemption cla......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
The prevention principle in the context of shipbuilding disputes - delays and cancellation
...exclude the application of the prevention principle by including wording to this effect in the contract (Micklefield v SAC Technology [1990] 1 WLR 1002). The wording usually takes the form of an extension of time (EOT) clause. EOT clauses allow the builder additional time to complete the co......
1 books & journal articles
-
WORKPLACE SEXUAL HARASSMENT IN SINGAPORE: THE LEGAL CHALLENGE
...LR 2 Exch 340; Ross v Pender(1874) IR 352; Laverack v Woods Ltd[1966] 3 All ER 683 (CA); Middlefield v SAC Technology Ltd[1990] 1 WLR 1002. 174 McGregor on Damages, supra n 166 at para 1240. 175 Addis v Gramophone Co [1909] AC 488 (HL); Shone v Downs Surgical[1984] 1 All ER 7; O’Laoire v Ja......