Micklethwait v Newlay Bridge Company
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1885 |
| Year | 1885 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
13 cases
-
Fortune and Others v Wiltshire Council and Another
...half the river bed or half the soil of the highway, as the case may be. This principle is clearly articulated by this court in Micklethwait v Newlay Bridge Co (1886) LR 33 Ch D 133. All three Lords Justices approved the principle. It is only necessary to quote one of them, Lopes LJ: "… if l......
-
John Hanita Paki and Others v Attorney-General of New Zealand for and on Behalf of The Crown
...Australia [1982] AC 706 (PC) at 715; and Attorney-General v Leighton [1955] NZLR 750 (CA) at 790. 116 Micklethwait v Newlay Bridge Co (1886) 33 Ch D 133 (CA) at 117 Lord v Commissioners for the City of Sydney (1859) 7 Moore 473 at 497, 14 ER 991 (PC) at 1000. 118 At 497–498. 119 At 490. 120......
-
R. v. Lewis (A.J.) et al., (1996) 196 N.R. 165 (SCC)
...intention: see G.V. La Forest, Water Law in Canada -- The Atlantic Provinces (1973), at p. 243; Micklethwait v. Newlay Bridge Co. (1886), 33 Ch. D. 133 (C.A.), at p. 145. This presumption was made applicable in British Columbia as of November 19, 1858 by virtue of the English Law Ordinance,......
-
Geraghty v Rohan Industrial Estates Ltd
...v. Rich (1871) I.R. 6 C.L. 144. Berridge v. Ward (1861) 10 C.B. (N.S.) 400; 30 L.J.C.P. 218. Micklethwait v. Newlay Bridge Company (1886) 33 Ch. D. 133; 2 T.L.R. 344. Arbitration - Misconduct - Hearing - Arbitration Act, 1954 (No. 26), s. 38. Contract - Sale of land - Conditions - Particula......
Request a trial to view additional results