Middleton v Pollock, ex parte Elliott
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1875 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
12 cases
-
Re Sarflax Ltd
...and points of claim must be struck out as disclosing no reasonable cause of action (post, pp. 602A-F, 612C-E). Middleton v. Pollock (1876) 2 Ch.D. 104;Glegg v. Bromley[1912] 3 K.B. 474, C.A.; In re Lloyd's Furniture Palace Ltd.[1925] Ch. 853 and Tomkins v. Saffery (1877) 3 App.Cas. 213, H.L......
- P.T. Garuda Indonesia Ltd v Grellman
-
Pankhurst v Oasis Developments Ltd et Al; Connolly v Oasis Development et Al
...3 KB 474]. A transaction is not affected unless it cloaks some benefit to The Company. As Jessel MR explained [ Middleton v. Pollock (1876) 2 Ch D 104, at p 108–9]' “the meaning of the statute is that the debtor must not retain a benefit for himself. It has no regard whatever to the questio......
-
Newfoundland and Labrador Housing Corp. v. Ennis, (1987) 64 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 22 (NFTD)
...60; 50 A.P.R. 60, refd to. [para. 19]. Mulcahy et al. v. Archibald (1898), 28 S.C.R. 523, refd to. [para. 20]. Middleton v. Pollock (1876), 2 Ch. D. 104, refd to. [para. Wood v. Dixie (1845), 7 Q.B. 892; 115 E.R. 724, refd to. [para. 26]. Hillingdon Estates Co. v. Stonefield Estates Ltd., [......
Request a trial to view additional results