Midland Bank Plc v Pike

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtChancery Division
Year1988
Date1988

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
12 cases
  • Croydon (Unique) Ltd v Wright (Crombie and Another intervening)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 29 July 1999
    ...direct by sub-demise." 95 This finding under section 146(4) would not appear to include the holder of a charging order. 96 In Midland Bank plc v Pike [1988] 2 All E R 434, the holder of a charging order sought an order for sale under section 30 of the Law of Property Act as a 'person intere......
  • Gotham v Doodes
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 25 July 2006
    ...sale, whether as a joint owner or an equitable chargee, must be made under s.14, see Lloyds Bank plc v Byrne (1991) 23 HLR 472 and Midland Bank plc v Pike [1988] 2 AER 434. 13 13. In this context the Bankrupt has contended that the order under s.313 made in favour of the Trustee in 1992 cre......
  • Walker v Lundborg (The Bahamas)
    • United Kingdom
    • Privy Council
    • 6 March 2008
    ...property is not a marketable asset. If authority is needed for these propositions it is provided by Midland Bank Ltd v Pike [1988] 2 All E R 434. The Court of Appeal referred to that case but seems, with respect, to have misunderstood it. The important difference between Bahamian and Engli......
  • Swiss Reinsurance Co. v. Camarin Ltd. et al., 2015 BCCA 466
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • 13 November 2015
    ...Co., [1985] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 312 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 91]. Commercial Union Assurance Co. v. NRG Victory Reinsurance Ltd., [1988] 2 All E.R. 434 (C.A.), refd to. [para. London County Commercial Reinsurance Office Ltd., Re, [1922] 2 Ch. 67, refd to. [para. 98]. Omega Proteins v. Aspen Insur......
  • Get Started for Free