Midland Bank Plc v Pike
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1988 |
| Year | 1988 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
13 cases
-
Croydon (Unique) Ltd v Wright (Crombie and Another intervening)
...something in the nature of a sub-demise, and can refer to what one might call a horizontal rather than a vertical transfer. 39 In Midland Bank plc v. Pike (1988) 2 All ER 434 the question was whether a Creditor holding a charging order may obtain an order for sale under section 30 of the La......
-
Gotham v Doodes
...sale, whether as a joint owner or an equitable chargee, must be made under s.14, see Lloyds Bank plc v Byrne (1991) 23 HLR 472 and Midland Bank plc v Pike [1988] 2 AER 434. 13 13. In this context the Bankrupt has contended that the order under s.313 made in favour of the Trustee in 1992 cre......
-
Walker v Lundborg (The Bahamas)
...property is not a marketable asset. If authority is needed for these propositions it is provided by Midland Bank Ltd v Pike [1988] 2 All E R 434. The Court of Appeal referred to that case but seems, with respect, to have misunderstood it. The important difference between Bahamian and Engli......
-
Lloyds Bank Plc v Byrne & Byrne
...[1991] Ch 142; [1990] 3 WLR 880; [1990] 3 All ER 952. Kemmis v Kemmis (Welland Intervening) [1988] 1 WLR 1307. Midland Bank plc v Pike [1988] 2 All ER 434. Stott v Ratcliffe [1982] 126 SJ Raymond Cox for the bank. Richard Oughton for the wife. LORD JUSTICE PARKER.The facts of this case are ......
Request a trial to view additional results