Migotti v Colvill

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date1878
Date1878
Year1878
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
19 cases
  • FB and Others (HC 395 para 284: 'Six months') Bangladesh
    • United Kingdom
    • Asylum and Immigration Tribunal
    • 16 March 2006
    ... ... referred to: Clayton's Case (1585) 5 Rep la Dodds v WalkerWLR [1981] 1 WLR 1027 Migotti v ColvillELR (1879) 4 CPD 233 Pearson v Immigration Appeal Tribunal [1978] Imm AR 212 R v Immigration Appeal Tribunal ... [44] A period of six months' leave is thus to be calculated according to the rule in Migotti and Colvill ; and each of the periods of leave granted to the Appellants was therefore a period of six months and one day, which is a period of more than six ... ...
  • Lim You Keng; Setali Development Sdn Bhd and Another
    • Malaysia
    • Federal Court (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • Chong Mee Yoke; Jeow Fong Mei
    • Malaysia
    • Court of Appeal (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • LEE KUANG GUAT vs CHIANG WOEI CHIEN
    • Malaysia
    • Magistrates Court (Malaysia)
    • 30 November 2020
    ...and Revised 1989) (Act 388), "year" means “a year reckoned according to the Gregorian calendar”. [6] [19] In Migotti v Colvill (1879) 4 C.P.D. 233 at page 238, Brett LJ explained “month” according to the Gregorian calendar. He ‘The term a calendar month is a legal and technical term… The me......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT