Miguel Sanchez & Compania S.L. v Result (Owners). Nello Simoni Ltd, Third Party.; The Result
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1958 |
| Year | 1958 |
| Court | Probate, Divorce and Admiralty Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
Bradley Lomas Electrolok Ltd and Another v Colt Ventilation East Asia Pte Ltd and Others
...the cause or matter. Mr Sivananthan referred to The Result; Miguel Sanchez & Compania SL v Result (Owners) (Nello Simoni Ltd, third party) [1958] P 174 at p 179 where Willmer J said: Having regard to the terms of the rule, it appears to me that the questions to be determined on this summons......
-
Donnell v JGM Bank Ltd
...2 C.P.D. 80; [1874–80] All E.R. Rep. 774, distinguished. (5) Sanchez (Miguel) & Cia. S.L. v. Result (Owners), The Result, [1958] P. 174; [1958] 1 All E.R. 839. Legislation construed: Grand Court (Civil Procedure) Rules, r.26: The relevant terms of this rule are set out at page 3, lines 10–1......
-
The Owners Of Cargo Lately Laden On Board The "C.r. Pointe Noire" v The Owners Of The Ship "C.r. Pointe Noire" And Another
...satisfied that the fact situation falls within any of the provisions of these two rules. Reference can be made to the case of The Result [1958] P.174. In that case Nello Simoni Ltd ("Nello") agreed to buy from the plaintiffs oranges. The plaintiffs under a bill of lading shipped only part o......
-
Papua New Guinea Printing Co Pty Ltd v Andrew Thompson
...touched on which included Montgomery v Foey Morgan & Co [1895] 2 QB 321 and Miguel Sanchez & Compania SL v Result (Owners) (The Result) [1958] P 174. In that first mention case there was in fact a dispute between the respective parties as to the right to moneys deposited for freight and tha......
2 books & journal articles
-
Action
...(Pt. 354) 42 at 70. (2) “In the case of Miguel Sanchez and Compania SL v. Result owners Wello Simoni Limited. Third Party (The Result) (1958) Probate (174), the learned Judge had this to say namely:- “Having regard to the terms of the rule, it appears to me that the question to be determine......
-
JOINDER OF ADDITIONAL PARTIES
...is a party. This is purely a question of jurisdiction. In considering Order 16 rule 11 of the English Rules Willmer J. in The Results (1958) Probate 174: - said at page 179: "The rule providing for the joinder of additional parties is R.S.C., Ord. 16, r. 11. It is not, I think, disputed tha......