Miller v Cannon Hill Estates Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1931
CourtDivisional Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
43 cases
4 books & journal articles
  • Security for performance
    • United Kingdom
    • Construction Law. Volume II - Third Edition
    • 13 April 2020
    ...Hese GmbH [2008] BLr 155 at 172 [129]–173 [135], per ramsey J. 549 Hart v Alexander (1844) 12 M&W 68; Miller v Cannon Hill Estates Ltd [1931] 2 KB 113 at 120–121, per Swift J; Perry v Sharon Development Co Ltd [1937] 4 all Er 390 (Ca); Lynch v horne [1956] 1 all Er 744 at 745, per Lord Ever......
  • THE SPEARIN DOCTRINE AND THE ECONOMIC LOSS RULE IN RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION
    • United States
    • Colorado Bar Association Practitioner's Guide to Colorado Construction Law (CBA) Helpful Resources
    • Invalid date
    ...399, 402 (Colo. 1964). The implied warranty of habitability originated with the English case of Miller v. Cannon Hill Estates, Ltd., [1931] 2 K.B. 113, which recognized that a buyer who contracts on a house while it is still under construction expects that the final product will be fit for ......
  • The Spearin Doctrine and the Economic Loss Rule in Residential Construction - July 2006 - Construction Law
    • United States
    • Colorado Bar Association Colorado Lawyer No. 35-7, July 2006
    • Invalid date
    ...399, 402 (Colo. 1964). The implied warranty of habitability originated with the English case of Miller v. Cannon Hill Estates, Ltd., [1931] 2 K.B. 113, which recognized that a buyer who contracts on a house while it is still under construction expects that the final product will be fit for ......
  • Caveat Emptor: The Position at Common Law
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Special Lectures 2002. Real Property Law: Conquering the Complexities Part II
    • 31 August 2003
    ...a house. 44 See the papers by McLellan and by Herskowitz reproduced elsewhere in this volume. 45 Miller v. Cannon Hill Estates Ltd., [1931] 2 K.B. 113; Croft v. Prendergast, [1949] O.K. 282; and Strata Plan N.W. 2294 v. Oak Tree Construction Ltd. (1994), 93 B.C.L.R. (2d) 590 (C.A.). Where o......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT