Mills and Others v The Queen
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Court | Privy Council |
| Judgment Date | 01 March 1995 |
| Date | 01 March 1995 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
40 cases
-
Jordan Thompson v R
...321, R v Winston Hankle (1992) 29 JLR 62, and Dwayne White [2013] JMCA Crim 11 and by the Privy Council in an appeal from Jamaica in Mills and Others v R [1995] 3 All ER 865; 875–876. In both Hankle and Mills, as in the instant case, there was no objection to the admissibility of the statem......
-
Mark France and Rupert Vassell v The Queen
...in relying on this type of evidence to the actual circumstances of the case on which they have to reach a verdict. As the Board said in Mills v The Queen [1995] 1 WLR 511, 518 the Turnbull principles do not impose a fixed formula for adoption in every case. It will suffice if the trial jud......
-
R v Brown (Gavaska), Kevin Brown and Troy Matthews
...did not give such a direction. Instead the judge gave the Leary Walker direction ( D.P.P. v. Leary Walker 21 W.I.R. 406 at 411 ). 44 In Mills et al v R (1995) 46 W.I.R. 240 the Privy Council held that the observations of Lord Widgery in Turnbull have no application to an alibi put forward ......
-
R v Jarret (Andre)
...of the evidence rather than on the uncertain test of whether the making of the statement was part of the event or transaction. In Mills and Others v.R. (1995) 3 All ER 865 (pages 875–6) their Lordships expressed the view that a re-examination of the requirements governing dying declaration......
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
Case Law
...according to the relevant principles. On YOur Feet Authority Brief Summary of Case Law Type of Offence/ Areas/Act Mills et al v R (1995) 3 All ER 865 (1995) 46 WIR 240 Regina v Andrews [1987] AC 281; [1987] 1 All ER 513 Gives an overview of case law in this area. Where the deceased last wor......
