Mills Conduit Investment Ltd v Leslie
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1932 |
| Year | 1932 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 cases
-
Real Estate Consortium Pte Ltd v
...to be harsh and unconscionable, the court refused to enforce a consent to judgment: see Mills Conduit Investment Ltd. v. Leslie [1932] 1 K.B. 233. On the other hand, it is important that the courts should enforce compromises which are agreed in good faith between the lender and borrower. If......
-
Rasik Thakrar Vinod Thakrar Nilesh Thakrar Ciro Citterio Menswer v Kirit Thakrar
...was so high that it was presumed to be harsh and unconscionable, the court refused to enforce a consent to judgment: see Mills Conduit Investment Ltd. v Leslie [1932] 1 K.B. 233. On the other hand, it is important that the courts should enforce compromises which are agreed in good faith bet......
-
Binder v Alachouzos
...was so high that it was presumed to be harsh and unconscionable, the Court refused to enforce a consent to Judgment, see Mills Conduit Investment. Ltd, v. Leslie (1932) 1 K.B. 233. 8 On the other hand. it is important that the Courts should enforce compromises which are agreed in good faith......
-
Horace Yao Yee Cheong And Another v Kevin Mark Bradshaw
...presumed to be harsh and unconscionable the court refused to enforce a consent to judgment: see Mills Conduit Investments Ltd v Leslie [1932] 1 KB 233. On the other hand, it is important that the courts should enforce compromises which are agreed in good faith between lender and borrower. I......
Request a trial to view additional results