Mills, Mills, Mills and Mills v R
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judgment Date | 1995 |
| Year | 1995 |
| Date | 1995 |
| Court | Privy Council |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
32 cases
-
R v Brown (Gavaska), Kevin Brown and Troy Matthews
...a direction. Instead the judge gave the Leary Walker direction ( D.P.P. v. Leary Walker 21 W.I.R. 406 at 411 ). 44 In Mills et al v R (1995) 46 W.I.R. 240 the Privy Council held that the observations of Lord Widgery in Turnbull have no application to an alibi put forward only in an unsworn......
-
Yourrick Furlonge Appellant v The Queen Respondent [ECSC]
...the prosecution's case to the jurors. In the present case, the trial judge's directions in relation to this issue were adequate. Mills and Others v R (1995) 46 WIR 240 applied; Leroy Langford and Another v The State [2005] UKPC 20 followed. 2. While it may have been prudent for the trial......
-
Mark France and Rupert Vassell v The Queen
... ... As the Board said in Mills v The Queen [1995] 1 WLR 511, 518 the Turnbull principles do not ... ...
-
Rayon Williams v R
...a review of his unsworn statement, something the learned judge was not required to do. Reliance was placed on Mills, Mills and Mill v R (1995) 46 WIR 240, a decision of the Privy 157 The learned DPP argued that the appellant's submission that the court is not able to conduct a review of th......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Case Law
...should be told to accord to such statements the appropriate weight they think the alibi deserves. Mills, Mills, Mills and Mills v R (1995) 46 WIR 240 Privy Council, Jamaica 82 Case Law Type of Offence/ Areas/Act Authority Brief Summary of Case Law Where the accused gives evidence and invoke......