Mills v Armstrong. The "Bernina"
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 24 February 1888 |
| Date | 24 February 1888 |
| Court | House of Lords |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
30 cases
-
Grant v Sun Shipping Company Ltd
... ... As Lord Herschell said in your Lordships' House in ( The Bernina 13 A.C. 1 , at p. 9): "If by a collision between two vehicles a person unconnected ... ...
-
Wellwood v Alexander King Ltd
... ... contractor can, it is said, touch the plaintiff, for which proposition counsel cited The Bernina (2) ... The Judge accepted this proposition, and, notwithstanding the findings, entered judgment for ... which caused the accident, and there could be no finding of joint negligence as in Armstrong v. the Lancashire and Yorkshire Railway Company (2) , The Bernina (1) ... The learned Judge's action ... ...
-
Gaffney v Dublin United Tramways Company
... ... This was after the decision of the House of Lords in Radley's Case ( 4 ). In The Bernina ( 5 ), Lord Esher M.R. says (Rule 5):— “If, although the plaintiff has himself, or by his ... ...
-
Standard Chartered Bank v Pakistan National Shipping Corporation (No. 4) (Reduction of Damages)
...nature of the rule was expounded by Lindley L.J. in The Bernina (1887) 12 P.D. 58 at 89 (affirmed by the House of Lords (1888) 13 App. Cas. 1). Eighth Report of the Law Revision Committee (June 1939 Cmd. 6032) 17 The Committee's members who were of the utmost distinction recommended that th......
Request a trial to view additional results