Mills v Barnsley Metropolitan Council

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1992
Year1992
CourtCourt of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
43 cases
  • Sarah McArdle v Department of Regional Development
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Northern Ireland)
    • 4 March 2005
    ... ... foresight of harm to users of the pavement – see Steyn LJ in Mills v Barnsley Metropolitan Council (unreported 7 February 1992). Steyn LJ ... ...
  • Paul Singh v The City of Cardiff Council
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • 23 June 2017
    ...shows a breach of duty. The escape from any apparent circularity was stated, or re-stated, I think, by Steyn L.J. in Mills v Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council [1992] P.I.Q.R. P291 (to which my Lord has already referred) where, in holding that no breach of duty had been established, he p......
  • Demetrios Karpasitis v Hertfordshire County Council
    • United Kingdom
    • King's Bench Division
    • 20 October 2023
    ...more than the physical surface: Thompson v Hampshire County Council [2004] EWCA Civ 1016 [2005] LGR 467. 25 In Mills v Barnsley MBC [1992] PIQR P291 Steyn LJ stated as follows: “..[I]n drawing the inference of dangerousness in this case, the judge impliedly set a standard which, if genera......
  • Colar & Singh v Highways England Company Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • County Court
    • 30 January 2020
    ...that proposition: “Subparagraph b) in the passage cited from the judgment of Steyn LJ [in Mills v Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council [1992] PIQR 291] reflects the need for the claimant to show that the danger was due to a failure to maintain in the absolute sense explained by Lord Dennin......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 firm's commentaries
  • Street Equipment
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq UK
    • 30 September 2022
    ...852 [paragraph 14] 2. Yetkin v Mahmood & London Borough of Newham [2010] EWCA Civ 776 3. Mills v Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council [1992] 1 PIQR P291 4. Lewis v Wandsworth Borough Council [2020] EWHC 3205 (QB) 5. Dean & Chapter of Rochester Cathedral v Debell [2016] EWCA Civ 1094 The co......
  • Highways: Expecting The Unexpected
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq UK
    • 8 February 2023
    ...not endanger pedestrians as they pass and repass along the highway. Importantly, as the Court of Appeal explained in Mills v Barnsley (1992) 1 PIQR 291, this is a principle which is grounded in 'Finally, I add that, in drawing the inference of dangerousness in this case, the judge impliedly......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT