Milson v Carter

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
Judgment Date1893
Year1893
Date1893
CourtPrivy Council
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
25 cases
  • Vishnu Narine Sarju v Felix Walker (No 2)
    • Guyana
    • Court of Appeal (Guyana)
    • Invalid date
  • Owston Nominees (No 2) Pty Ltd v Branirpty Ltd
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • A v A
    • Bermuda
    • Supreme Court (Bermuda)
    • 7 January 2016
    ...v. Bernhard Bartels [1954] 1 W.L.R. 1457; [1954] 3 All E.R. 659, CA; Lawrie v. Lees (1881) 7 App. Cas. 19 at 34, 35; Milson v. Carter [1893] A.C. 638; Kay & Lovell [1941] Ch. 420; City Housing Trust [1942] 2 Ch. 262.’ 45 My intention when making the Consent Order was to give effect to the ......
  • Re Opes Prime Stockbroking Ltd
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • Nigeria
    • DSC Publications Online Sasegbon's Laws of Nigeria. Volume 7: Part I Preliminary sections
    • 29 June 2016
    ...Miller v. Minister of Pensions (1947) 2 All E.R. 372….............................................……….259, 262 Milson v. Cater (1893) A.C. 638; (62 L.J.P.C. 126………......................................................………577 Ministry of Pensions & National Insurance v. Jones (1966) 1 Q.B. 48......
  • SLIP RULE OR SLIP IN JUDGMENT OF COURT
    • Nigeria
    • DSC Publications Online Sasegbon’s Judicial Dictionary of Nigerian Law. First edition S
    • 6 February 2019
    ...properly brought to its notice. Lord Hobhouse delivering the opinion of the Board of Privy Council in the case of Milson v. Carter (1893) A.C. 638 observed at p. 639-640: - "This is an application on the part of the respondent in the appeal now dismissed Milson v. Carter asking for an order......