Minet v Morgan

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of Appeal
Year1865
Date1865

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
22 cases
  • JP Morgan Multi-Strategy Fund LP v Macro Fund Ltd
    • Cayman Islands
    • Grand Court (Cayman Islands)
    • 30 May 2003
    ... ... 478 ; 152 E.R. 558, dicta of Parke , B. distinguished. (28) Marston v. DownesENR (1834), 6 C. & P. 380 ; 172 E.R. 1285 , considered. (29) Meath (Bishop) v. Westminster (Marquis)ENR (1836), 4 Cl. & Fin. 445 ; 7 E.R. 171 , dicta of Lord Brougham considered. (30) Minet v. MorganELR (1873), L.R. 8 Ch. App. 361 , distinguished. (31) Pearce v. FosterELR (1885), 15 Q.B.D. 114, dicta of Brett , M.R. considered. (32) Pizzey v. Ford Motor Co. Ltd. , [1994] P.I.Q.R. P15 , considered. (33) Quinn v. Leathem , [1901] A.C. 495 ; (1901), 85 L.T ... ...
  • Crescent Farm (Sidcup) Sports Ltd v Sterling Offices Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • Invalid date
    ...of Kekewich J. in Williams v. Quebrada Railway Land & Copper Co.[1895] 2 Ch. 751Minet v. Morgan (1873) L.R. 8 Ch. App. 361 and Schneider v. Leigh [1955] 2 Q.B. 195, C.A. Greenlaw v. Ring (1838) 1 Beav. 137 doubted. (2) That the privilege was not lost by reason of the alleged torts of in......
  • Calcraft v Guest
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • Invalid date
    ... ... The defendant having appealed:— ... Held, (1.) following Minet v. Morgan, (1873) L. R. 8 Ch. 361, that the documents remained privileged, (2.) following Lloyd v. Mostyn, (1842) 10 M. & W. 478, that the defendant ... ...
  • Goddard v Nationwide Building Society
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 27 June 1986
    ... ... 21 In so far as the first question was concerned, the Court of Appeal, following the earlier decision in Minet v. Morgan [1873] L.R. 8 Ch.361 , held in effect that once privileged, always privileged and that the then owner of the fishery was entitled to ... ...
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • ADMISSIBILITY, PRIVILEGE AND THE EXPUNGING OF EVIDENCE
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 1994, December 1994
    • 1 December 1994
    ...cf. Schneider v Leigh[1955] 2 QB 195. The last is where the third party is a successor-in-title of the privilege holder: Minet v Morgan(1873) 8 Ch App 361; Calcraft v Guest[1898] 1 QB 759. 21 Whether by production of the document or by disclosing knowledge of its contents. 22 The most commo......