Ministere de l'Agriculture de la Foret v Bernard Matthews Plc
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Neutral Citation | [2002] EWHC 190 (Ch) |
| Date | 2002 |
| Year | 2002 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
7 cases
-
Decision Nº O/367/04 from Intellectual Property Office - (Trade market), 14 December 2004
...Mark [2002] RPC 45, then in État Française Représentée Par la Ministère de L' 11 of 34 Agriculture de la Forêt v Bernard Matthews Plc [2002] ETMR 90 and most recently in EI Du Pont de Nemours & Company v ST Dupont [2003] EWCA Civ. 1368. In the latter judgment Aldous LJ, having considered th......
-
Decision Nº O/171/06 from Intellectual Property Office - (Trade market), 20 June 2006
...Wunderkind Trade Mark [2002] RPC 45, État Française Représentée Par la Ministère de L' Agriculture de la Forêt v Bernard Matthews Plc [2002] ETMR 90 and EI Du Pont de Nemours & Company v ST Dupont [2004] FSR 15. However, the analogy is obviously not very exact as the considerations for evid......
-
Miguel Torres SA v Cantine Mezzacorona SCARL
...considers an application to admit new evidence on an appeal from a Hearing Officer under the 1994 Act was considered in Label Rouge TM [2003] FSR 2, particularly at paragraphs 9 to 18. The conclusion was that the rules in Ladd –v—Marshall [1954] 1 WLR 1489 were of significant relevance to a......
-
Decision Nº O/090/05 from Intellectual Property Office - (Trade market), 7 April 2005
...Trade Mark [2002] RPC 45, then in État Française Représentée Par la Ministère de L' Agriculture de la Forêt v Bernard Matthews Plc [2002] ETMR 90 and most recently in EI Du Pont de Nemours & Company v ST Dupont [2004] FSR 15. Analogy is not the same as equivalence and analogy can distort. T......
Request a trial to view additional results