Mitchell v B. W. Noble Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1927
Year1927
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
65 cases
  • Lawson v Johnson Matthey Plc
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 14 May 1992
    ...rid of an obstacle to successful trading is a revenue and not a capital payment. I refer in particular to Mitchell v. B.W. Noble Ltd. [1927] 1 K.B. 719; Anglo-Persian Oil Co. Ltd. v. Dale [1932] 1 K.B. 124; and Commissioners of Inland Revenue v. Carron Co. (1968) 45 T.C. 18. This must be no......
  • Morgan v Tate & Lyle Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 1 June 1954
    ...in argument, throws any doubt upon the view which I have just expressed, and four at least of these cases support that view. In Mitchell v. B. W. Noble, Ltd. [1927] 1 K.B. 719 a payment made to secure the retiral of a director was held to be deductible, both by Rowlatt, J. and by the Court......
  • BG Lithographic Company Ltd v Commissioners of Inland Revenue
    • Guyana
    • Supreme Court (British Guiana)
    • Invalid date
  • Director-General of Inland Revenue v Kulim Rubber Plantations Ltd
    • Malaysia
    • Federal Court (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • RECONSIDERING THE INCOME TAX TREATMENT OF INVESTIGATION FEES.
    • Canada
    • University of Toronto Faculty of Law Review Vol. 79 No. 2, March 2021
    • 22 March 2021
    ...because they might cause people to move to the area which might provide the taxpayer increased business) and in Mitchell v BW Noble Ltd, [1927] 1 KB 719 at 720, [1927] All ER Rep 717 (EWCA), cited in Krishna, supra note 13, ch 9, n 30 (the tax authorities argued that a payment to get rid of......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT