Mitchell v The Queen

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
Judgment Date21 January 1998
Date21 January 1998
CourtPrivy Council
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
38 cases
  • R v Boxx
    • Jamaica
    • Court of Appeal (Jamaica)
    • Invalid date
  • Romeo Cannonier Appellant v DPP Respondent [ECSC]
    • St Kitts & Nevis
    • Court of Appeal (Saint Kitts and Nevis)
    • March 21, 2012
    ...Bhagwandeen Singh, Thomas (Clive), Gopaul (Robin) and Eversley (Stephen) v The State (1997) 53 WIR 352. 41David Mitchell v The Queen [1998] A.C. 695 at 42Rupert Crosdale v The Queen [1995] 1 W.L.R. 864 at 873. 43R v Azam (Usman Ali) [2006] Crim. L.R. 776, CA. 44R v Shuker and Shuker [1998] ......
  • Romeo Cannonier Appellant v DPP Respondent [ECSC]
    • St Kitts & Nevis
    • Court of Appeal (Saint Kitts and Nevis)
    • March 21, 2012
    ...Bhagwandeen Singh, Thomas (Clive), Gopaul (Robin) and Eversley (Stephen) v The State (1997) 53 WIR 352. 41David Mitchell v The Queen [1998] A.C. 695 at 42Rupert Crosdale v The Queen [1995] 1 W.L.R. 864 at 873. 43R v Azam (Usman Ali) [2006] Crim. L.R. 776, CA. 44R v Shuker and Shuker [1998] ......
  • Cannonier v The Director of Public Prosecutions; Isaac et Al v The Director of Public Prosecutions
    • St Kitts & Nevis
    • Court of Appeal (Saint Kitts and Nevis)
    • March 21, 2012
    ...to risk prejudicing a jury against a defendant, ought to be raised in their absence: see Mitchell's case ( David Mitchell v. The Queen [1998] A.C. 695 at 702-704.) (jury required to withdraw for the purposes of a voir dire on the admissibility of a confession); and Crosdale's case ( Rupert ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT