Mitchell v The Queen
Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
Judgment Date | 21 January 1998 |
Date | 21 January 1998 |
Court | Privy Council |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
38 cases
- R v Boxx
-
Romeo Cannonier Appellant v DPP Respondent [ECSC]
...Bhagwandeen Singh, Thomas (Clive), Gopaul (Robin) and Eversley (Stephen) v The State (1997) 53 WIR 352. 41David Mitchell v The Queen [1998] A.C. 695 at 42Rupert Crosdale v The Queen [1995] 1 W.L.R. 864 at 873. 43R v Azam (Usman Ali) [2006] Crim. L.R. 776, CA. 44R v Shuker and Shuker [1998] ......
-
Romeo Cannonier Appellant v DPP Respondent [ECSC]
...Bhagwandeen Singh, Thomas (Clive), Gopaul (Robin) and Eversley (Stephen) v The State (1997) 53 WIR 352. 41David Mitchell v The Queen [1998] A.C. 695 at 42Rupert Crosdale v The Queen [1995] 1 W.L.R. 864 at 873. 43R v Azam (Usman Ali) [2006] Crim. L.R. 776, CA. 44R v Shuker and Shuker [1998] ......
-
Cannonier v The Director of Public Prosecutions; Isaac et Al v The Director of Public Prosecutions
...to risk prejudicing a jury against a defendant, ought to be raised in their absence: see Mitchell's case ( David Mitchell v. The Queen [1998] A.C. 695 at 702-704.) (jury required to withdraw for the purposes of a voir dire on the admissibility of a confession); and Crosdale's case ( Rupert ......
Request a trial to view additional results