Mohamidu Mohideen Hadjiar v Pitchey
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judgment Date | 1894 |
| Date | 1894 |
| Year | 1894 |
| Court | Privy Council |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 cases
-
CIS 1423 1997
...also reinforced by the statement of general principle by Lord Macnaghten in the Privy Council in Mohamidu Mohideen Hadjiar v. Pitchey [1894] AC 437, at page “A creditor of a deceased debtor cannot sue a person named as executor in the will of the deceased unless he has either administered, ......
-
Finnell (Jeffrey) and Frank Feinstein ( Administrators for the estate of Irwin Finell) v Michael Dols and Patricia Dols
...also hold that the first defendant does not have the locus standi to challenge the validity of the Letters of Administration - see Mohamidu Hadjiur v. Pitchey (1894) A.C. 437 and Haukin v. Turner (1979) 10 Ch. 372. 16 In paragraphs 4 to 15 the defendant addresses the plaintiffs claim at pa......
-
Chern Chiow Yong and Others v Cheng Chew Chin
...that the probate has yet to be taken out. 3.The case close to point is the Privy Council case of Mohamidu Mohideen Hadjiar v Pitchey [1894] AC 437, an appeal from the Supreme Court of Ceylon. In that case, the executor named in a will had applied for probate and an order for the grant of pr......
-
Munster and Leinster Bank v Fanning
...[1895] 1 I. R. 468. (5) [1905] 1 I. R. 406, 409. (6) L. R. 5 Ch. 663. (7) [1894] 2 I. R. 1. (8) 2 Dowl. 87. (9) [1902] 1 I. R. 519. (10) [1894] A. C. 437. (11) [1905] 1 I. R. (1) 21 L. R. Lr. 503. (2) [1902] 1 I. R. 519. (3) [1900] 1 Ch. 58. (4) 43 Ir. L. T. R. 95. (1) [1895] 2 I. R. 90. (2......
Request a trial to view additional results