Mohammed-Holgate v Duke

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1983
CourtCourt of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
35 cases
  • Chee Siok Chin and Others v Minister for Home Affairs and Another
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 7 December 2005
    ......What must always be borne in mind and indeed emphasised (as per Lord Diplock in Holgate-Mohammed v Duke [1984] AC 437 at 446) is that: . [The] lawfulness of the arrest and detention based on that suspicion [does] not depend upon the judge’s own view ......
  • Police Federation and Others v Commissioner of The Independent Commission of Investigations and Attorney General
    • Jamaica
    • Supreme Court (Jamaica)
    • 30 July 2013
    ......Vide Holgate Mohammed v. Duke [1984] AC 437 . . 51 Counsel's contention was that it was clearly the intent of section 20 of the Act to give the ......
  • Raissi v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 12 November 2008
    ...officer at the time he makes the arrest. iv) The executive “discretion” to arrest or not, as Lord Diplock described it in Mohammed- Holgate v. Duke [1984] AC 437, 446, vests in the constable, who is engaged on the decision whether to arrest or not, and not in his superior officers. 14 At [2......
  • R v Commissioners of Inland Revenue, ex parte Mead and Cook
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • 20 March 1992
    ......The exercise by the Chief Constable and the Commissioner of his administrative discretion is reviewable: see Holgate-Mohammed v. Duke ELR [1984] A.C. 437, 448, which is to be preferred to Lord Denning's obiter comments at p. 126A-E in Ex p. Blackburn [1968] and Hallett v. ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • The Police and Criminal Evidence Bill — Part 2
    • United Kingdom
    • Police Journal: Theory, Practice and Principles No. 57-2, April 1984
    • 1 April 1984
    ...if the detained person assaults thepolice constable he is not guiltyoftheassault (e.g. see the recent casesMohammed-Holgate v. Duke [1983] 3 All E.R. 526; Bentley v.Brudzinski(1982) 75 Cr. App. R. 217; McBean v. Parker. The Times.February 8, 1983; R. v. Podger [1979] Crim. L.R. 524; Wills v......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT