Mohammed v State
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judgment Date | 1998 |
| Date | 1998 |
| Year | 1998 |
| Court | Privy Council |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
7 cases
-
Hinds v Attorney General of Barbados and another
... ... The appellant's recollection is different: "I say that the Judge did state the offences for which legal aid was provided and told me that arson was not one of those offences. I don't recall the Judge saying that the case was ... 18 Secondly, the Board would reiterate what it said in Mohammed v The State [1999] 2 AC 111 at 124, that "… breach of a defendant's constitutional right to a fair trial must inevitably result in ... ...
-
Kenneth Anthony Paton Mills v HM Advocate and Another
...The stamp of constitutionality is an indication of the higher normative force which is attached to the relevant rights: see Mohammed v The State [1999] 2 AC 111, 123H." (Emphasis added) The reference to the ordinary law was, of course, a reference to the common law rule as stated in Attorn......
-
Turkington and Others (Practising as McCartan Turkington Breen) v Times Newspapers Ltd
... ... In Reg. v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, Ex parte Simms [2000] A.C. 115 , with the agreement of Lord Browne-Wilkinson and Lord Hoffmann, I drew attention to the ... attained the status of a constitutional right with attendant high normative force: see my speech in Reynolds, at 1029H-1030A; compare also Mohammed v. The State [1999] 2 A.C. 111 at 123H. Now, as Lord Nicholls of Birkenhead put it in Reynolds, freedom of expression is buttressed by the Human ... ...
-
Attorney General's Reference (No. 2 of 2001); R v J
... ... There might however be situations in which an accused might be substantially affected or materially prejudiced by the action of the state at an earlier date, in which case the period might commence before charge or summons (pp 1872-1873, paras 11-12). Following the decision of the ... If it is established, after the event, that a trial was unfair, any resulting conviction will be quashed: Mohammed v The State [1999] 2 AC 111 , 124; R v Togher [2001] 3 All ER 463 , 472; R v Forbes [2001] 1 AC 473 , 487, para 24; Mills v HM Advocate ... ...
Request a trial to view additional results