Mohammed v The State
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judgment Date | 1999 |
| Date | 1999 |
| Year | 1999 |
| Court | Privy Council |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
67 cases
-
The People (Director of Public Prosecutions) v J.C.
...facie exclusionary rule with a balancing test consistent with that applied by the Privy Council in the Trinidad and Tobago case of Mohammed v. The State [1999] 2 A.C. 111. There the evidence concerned a confession obtained in breach of a defendant's constitutional right to be informed of a......
- Re Proulx
-
Hinds v Attorney General of Barbados and another
...constitution, enables effect to be given to the guarantee of a fair hearing. 18 Secondly, the Board would reiterate what it said in Mohammed v The State [1999] 2 AC 111 at 124, that "… breach of a defendant's constitutional right to a fair trial must inevitably result in the conviction bei......
-
Kenneth Anthony Paton Mills v HM Advocate and Another
...of constitutionality is an indication of the higher normative force which is attached to the relevant rights: see Mohammed v The State [1999] 2 AC 111, 123H." (Emphasis added) The reference to the ordinary law was, of course, a reference to the common law rule as stated in Attorney-General......
Request a trial to view additional results
4 books & journal articles
-
Subject Index
...257Mitchell v Homfray (1881) 8 QBD 587........................................................ 225Mohammed v The State [1999] 2 WLR552..................................................... 49Moody v Cox [1917] 2 Ch 71 ............ 235Moore v R. Fox & Sons [1956] 1 QB 596...........................
-
Table of Cases
...Contractors Pty Ltd vTownsville-Thuringowa Water SupplyJoint Board [2005] 1 Qd R 373 . . . . . . . . . . 322Mohammed v The State [1999] 2 AC 111 . . . . 206Nanaimo Immigrant Settlement Society vBritish Columbia [2003] BCJNo 2305, SC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .55Noo......
-
The Exclusion of Improperly Obtained Evidence in Greece: Putting Constitutional Rights First
...of Legitimacy’[1987] Current Legal Problems 55.147 See above, nn. 124 and 125.148 See Ashworth, above n. 146 at 112; Mohammed vThe State [1999] 2 AC 111 at 124,per Lord Steyn.149 Ashworth, ‘Excluding Evidence as Protecting Rights’, above n. 71 at 729.150 Ibid. at 733.151 Ibid. at 729.152 Ch......
-
The admissibility of evidence obtained through human rights violations in Mauritius
...is fatal as it depends on the nature of the constitutional guarantee and the nature of the breach. In Allie Mohammed v The State [1999 2 WLR 552], which is a case that was decided subsequent to Coowar (supra) [Coowar v The State [1997 MR 123]], the Privy Council held that a voluntary confes......