Montgomery, Jones & Company v Liebenthal & Company
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1898 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
32 cases
-
Kenneth Allison Ltd and Others v A E Limehouse & Company
...is a proper acceptance. That is not a question of the jurisdiction of the court to make an order as to service." 12 Montgomery, Jones & Co. v. Liebenthal & Co. [1898] 1 Q.B. 487 was another case between an English company and a Scottish company. Their contract provided that, for the purpos......
- Chan Phooi Hoong and Another; Pegang Prospecting Company Ltd
- Commercial Union Assurance (M) Sdn Bhd v Pilihan Megah Sdn Bhd
-
Food Corporation of India v Marastro Compania Naviera S.A. of Panama (Trade Fortitude)
...predecessors, is unlimited, nevertheless the court will not in practice go outside the four grounds accepted as correct in Re Montgomery Jones & Co. v. Liebenthal & Co. (1898) 78 Law Times 406. The third of the four grounds is admitted mistake. The distinction between an admitted mistake, a......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
COMMERCE ASSURANCE LTD. V. ALHAJI BURAIMOH ALLI
...WACA 81. 13. May v. Mills, (1914) 30 T.L.R. 287. 14. Moore v. Butlin, (1837) 7 L.J.Q.B. 20. 30 15. Montgomery Jone & Co. v. Liebentnal, (1898) 78 L.T. 406. 16. Morgan v Harrison. (1907) 2 Ch. 137. NIGERIAN STATUTES REFERRED TO IN JUDGMENT: 35 Arbitration Act. (Cap. 13 Laws of the Federation......