Montreal Street Railway Company v Normandin
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judgment Date | 1917 |
| Date | 1917 |
| Court | Privy Council |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
139 cases
-
Cheong Seok Leng v Public Prosecutor
...was expressed by Lord Campbell in the case of Liverpool Borough Bank Turner (1861) 30 LJ Ch 379.In Montreal Street Railway Co v Normandin [1917] AC 170, Sir Arthur Channell, in delivering the judgment of the Privy Council, said (at p 174): The question whether provisions in a statute are di......
-
Thomas R Walcott Applicant v Attorney General of Saint Lucia Respondent [ECSC]
...act would not promote the main object of the provision." 54 That 'question was answered by the Privy Council in Montreal Street Railway Company v Normandin (1917) A.C. 170. mere, Sir Arthur Channel (delivering the judgment of the Board said at p.176) "When the provisions of a statue relate ......
-
Bin Hee Heng v Management Corp Strata Title No 647
...which seeks to provide for the efficient administration and management of subdivided buildings.In Montreal Street Railway Co v Normandin [1917] AC 170, the House of Lords applied the following principle: When the provisions of a statute relate to the performance of a public duty and the cas......
-
Chippewas of Sarnia Band v. Canada (Attorney General) et al., (1999) 101 O.T.C. 1 (SC)
...Babcock v. Archibald et al. (1981), 34 O.R.(2d) 65 (H.C.), refd to. [para. 688, footnote 363]. Montreal Street Railway Co. v. Normandin, [1917] A.C. 170, refd to. [para. 728, footnote Fahey v. Roberts (1916), 51 N.B.R.(2d) 329; 134 A.P.R. 329 (K.B.), refd to. [para. 732, footnote 378]. R. v......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Table of cases
...258 DLR (4th) 595, 2005 SCC 62 .................................................. 293–94, 295 Montreal Street Railway Co v Normandin, [1917] AC 170, 116 LT 162, 33 DLR 195 (PC) .........................................................................91 Montréal v 2952-1366 Québec Inc, [2005......
-
Technical Meaning and Meanings Fixed by Law
...synonym for “mandatory”; but this is confusing and misleading given the use of “imperative” to mean “binding” in Interpretation Acts. 45 [1917] AC 170 at 174–75 (PC) [ Montreal Street Railway ]. 46 [1994] 2 SCR 41 at 123–24. 47 [1995] 4 SCR 344 at para 42. STATUTORY INTERPRETATION 92 The co......