Moody v Cox and Hatt
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
| Judgment Date | 1917 |
| Year | 1917 |
| Date | 1917 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
121 cases
-
Pergamon Press Ltd v Maxwell
... ... Moody v. Cox and Hatt [1917] 2 Ch. 71, C.A. distinguished ... The following case is referred to in the judgment: ... Moody v. Cox and Hatt [1917] 2 Ch ... ...
-
Sharon Scally v Odilla Rhatigan
...[2005] UKHL 8, [2005] 1 WLR 567 approved; Flood v Flood [1999] 2 IR 234, Spencer v Kinsella [1996] 2 ILRM 401, Moody v Cox and Hatt [1917] 2 Ch 71, O'Carroll v Diamond [2005] IESC 21, [2005] 4 IR 41, Carroll v Carroll [1999] 4 IR 241, and Bristol and West Building Society v Mothew [1998......
-
Hong Leong Singapore Finance Ltd v United Overseas Bank Ltd
...as in a moral sense”: see Dering v Earl of Winchelsea [1775–1802] All ER Rep 140. This principle was similarly followed in Moody v Cox [1917] 2 Ch 71 where it was held by Warrington LJ at [I]n order to prevent a man coming for relief in connection with a transaction so tainted it must be sh......
-
Hilton v Barker Booth & Eastwood (A Firm)
...and his solicitor Chadwick J recognised that (p.815) the scope of the fiduciary duty depended on the terms of the retainer but, applying Moody v Cox, could not be cut down by virtue of the fact that the solicitor is, to the knowledge of one party, acting as solicitor also for the other. 21 ......
Get Started for Free
4 books & journal articles
-
Subject Index
...225Mohammed v The State [1999] 2 WLR552..................................................... 49Moody v Cox [1917] 2 Ch 71 ............ 235Moore v R. Fox & Sons [1956] 1 QB 596........................................................ 228Murray v United Kingdom (1996) 22EHRR 29 .....................
-
Burden of Proof in Undue Influence: Common Law and Codes on Collision Course
...to establish affirmatively that the transaction was a fair one: see e.g.Demerara Bauxite Co. Ltd v Hubbard [1923] AC 673; Moody v Cox [1917] 2 Ch 71. 236 THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE & PROOFBURDEN OF PROOF IN UNDUE INFLUENCE70 Above n. 65.intention that the concept of ‘active confi......
-
RECONCEPTUALISING FIDUCIARY REGULATION IN ACTUAL CONFLICTS.
...to the reasons. (50) See, eg, Hilton v Barker Booth & Eastwood [2005] 1 WLR 567, 569 [4] (Lord Scott) ('Hilton'), quoting Moody v Cox [1917] 2 Ch 71, 91 (Scrutton LJ) (51) See Stewart (n 34) 690 (Foster J). (52) Ibid 709. (53) Ibid 711. (54) [1934] 3 DLR 465, 469 (Lord Thankerton) (Priv......
-
Legal Profession
...to have pronounced for exact correspondence between the legal and ethical duties, for it said at [17], referring to Moody v Cox and Hatt[1917] 2 Ch 71 and Clark Boyce v Mouat[1994] 1 AC 428, that ‘[t]hese [legal] principles have since been encapsulated in rr 25 to 28 of the Legal Profession......
