More v Woreham

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date01 January 1580
Date01 January 1580
CourtHigh Court of Chancery

English Reports Citation: 21 E.R. 53

HIGH COURT OF CHANCERY

More
and
Woreham

Mews' Dig. tit. Evidence, V. Attendance of Witnesses, 8. Remedy for Non-Attendance, a. Attachment.

caet, 100. more v. woeeham 53 MOEE V. WOREHAM. A witness not able to travel, discharged of contempt.-Griffen Price made oath, that where the plaintant served a subposna upon him to appear before commissioners, to testify on the plaintant's party, he the said plaintant did not give or tender him the said Griffen any money for his charges; and also that he was sick then, and not able to travel; therefore ordered the said Griffen be discharged of the process of contempt gotten out against him for not being examined: More, plaintant; Woreham, defendant (Anno 22 Eliz. [1579-80]). [Mews' Dig. tit. Evidence, V. Attendance of Witnesses, 8. Remedy for Non-attendance, a. Attachment.]

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 books & journal articles
  • NC trend.
    • United States
    • Business North Carolina Vol. 29 No. 7, July 2009
    • 1 Julio 2009
    ...month Previous Previous % change from month year last year TAXABLE RETAIL SALES (1) ($000s) Asheville 157,190.0 260,896.6 210,558.9 (25.3) Cary 99,775.3 161,999.1 127,935.4 (22.0) Charlotte 742,293.7 972,747.9 956,397.4 (22.4) Concord 93,153.5 153,406.2 124,945.3 (25.4) Durham 275,119.8 301......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT