Morecambe and Heysham v Mecca Ltd
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1966 |
| Year | 1966 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
4 cases
-
Miss World Ltd v Miss Ireland Beauty Pageant
...PRODUCTS LTD V BORDEN 1990 1 AER 873 BOROUGH OF MORECAMBE & HEYSHAM V MECCA LTD 1962 RPC 145 BOROUGH OF MORECAMBE & HEYSHAM V MECCA LTD 1966 RPC 423 TRADE MARKS ACT 1963 MISS WORLD (JERSEY) LTD MISS WORLD (UK) LTD MRS OF THE WORLD PAGEANTS INC, RE UNREP FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA PINCUS 1.2......
-
Super Coffeemix Manufacturing Ltd v Unico Trading Pte Ltd and Another
...with that of the plaintiffs`. The law expects the consumers to use ordinary care and intelligence: see Morecambe & Heysham Corp v Mecca [1966] RPC 423. In the case of an educated consumer he would be able, without difficulty, to differentiate one from the other. In the case of an illiterate......
-
McDonald's Corporation v Future Enterprises Pte Ltd
...145 at [46] are instructive: The law expects the consumers to use ordinary care and intelligence: see Morecambe & Heysham Corp v Mecca [1966] RPC 423. In the case of an educated consumer he would be able, without difficulty, to differentiate one from the other. In the case of an illiterate ......
-
McDonald's Corp v Future Enterprises Pte Ltd
...145 at [46] are instructive: The law expects the consumers to use ordinary care and intelligence: see Morecambe & Heysham Corp v Mecca [1966] RPC 423. In the case of an educated consumer he would be able, without difficulty, to differentiate one from the other. In the case of an illiterate ......