Morgan v Liverpool Corporation
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1927 |
| Year | 1927 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
17 cases
-
O'Brien (A.P.) and Another (A.P.) v Robinson
...have to be established in reliance upon the provisions of section 4 of the Occupiers Liability Act, 1957 . 12In the case of Morgan v. Liverpool Corporation [1927] 2 K.B. 131 one basis of claim was that there had been a failure to perform the statutory undertaking that the house would be......
-
O'Shea, Cork County Council on
...injury, in time to have rectified it before the injury was sustained. The principles set out in Morgan v. Liverpool CorporationELR, [1927] 2 K. B. 131, applied. Supreme Court O'Neill v. Cork Corporation HUGH O'NEILL Plaintiff and THE LORD MAYOR, ALDERMEN AND BURGESSES OF THE CITY OF CORK De......
-
Salford City Council v McNally
...1936, which in essence corresponds with section 6(2) of the 1957 Act, Lord Atkin adopted the view he had earlier expressed in Morgan v. Liverpool Corporation [1927] 2 K.B. 131, at 145 that: — "If the state of repair of a house is such that by ordinary user damage may naturally be caused to......
-
Edwards v Kumarasamy
...own possession …; and (3) … the repairs of dwelling-houses … are … not … such as to demand of the landlord incessant vigilance …" 34 Morgan v Liverpool Corpn [1927] 2 KB 131 was a case like the present, in that it involved a statutorily implied liability on a landlord of a dwelling (in tha......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Improving Housing Conditions in the Private and Social Rented Sectors: The Homes (Fit for Human Habitation) Act 2018 ‐ Fit for Habitation but Fit for Purpose?
...Earle vCharalambous [2006] EWCA Civ 1090.81 See Lord Neuberger’s discussion in Edwards n 74 above at [32]-[39] of Morgan vLiverpool Corpn[1927] 2 KB 131 and Carrick vLiverpool Corpn [1947] AC 219 as to the requirement for noticeto be served; see also O’Brien vRobinson ibid where the House o......