Morland and Another, Assignees of Dickins and Warwick, Bankrupts, against Pellatt

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date01 January 1828
Date01 January 1828
CourtCourt of the King's Bench

English Reports Citation: 108 E.R. 1211

IN THE COURT OF KING'S BENCH.

Morland and Another, Assignees of Dickins and Warwick, Bankrupts, against Pellatt

S. C. 3 Man. & Ry. 411; 7 L. J. K. B. O. S. 54. Adopted, In re Greer, [1895] 2 Ch. 221. Referred to, Bower v. Hett, [1895] 2 Q. B. 56, 337.

[722] morland and another, Assignees of Dickins and Warwick, Bankrupts, against pellatt. 1828. Judgment was entered up on a warrant of attorney given by two joint-traders, and a fi. fa. issued, returnable on the 2d of May. On the 1st of that month the sheriff's officer received from the defendants the money directed to be levied. On the 2d of May one of them committed an act of bankruptcy, and the other on the 5th. On the llth a commission of bankrupt issued, and on the 19th the sheriff paid over the money to the execution-creditor. In an action by the assignees: Held, that he was entitled to retain it, not being creditor having a security at the time of the bankruptcy. [S. C. 3 Man. & Ry. 411; 7 L. J. K. B. 0. S. 54. Adopted, In re Greer, [1895] 2 Ch. 221. Referred to, Sower v. Hett, [1895] 2 Q. B. 56, 337.] Assumpsit for money had and received. Plea, the general issue. At the trial before Park J. at the Devonshire Summer Assizes 1828, it appeared that in August 1826, the bankrupts were indebted to the defendant in the sum of 2181., for which he caused them to be arrested. They, thereupon, gave him a warrant of attorney for the amount, which was duly filed, and judgment was entered up on the 5th of March 1827, and a fi. fa. issued against the bankrupts, returnable on the 2d of May. The goods of the bankrupts were seized on the 7th of March, but not sold, they making payments to the officer of the sheriff from time to time; and on the 1st of May they paid him the balance of the sum directed to be levied. On the 2d of May the officer paid over the money to the under-sheriff, but he refused to pay it to the defendant Pellatt without an indemnity. On the llth of May an indemnity was given, and on the 19th the money was paid over. An act of bankruptcy was committed by Warwick on the 2d of May, and by Dickins on the 5th. On the 12th a commission of bankrupt was issued against them, under which the plaintiffs were duly chosen assignees. The learned Judge thought, that, under these circumstances, the plaintiffs were entitled to recover by virtue of the 6 G. 4, c. 16, s. 108, inasmuch as the money was not paid over to the defendant until after the bankruptcy of Warwick and...

To continue reading

Request your trial
11 cases
  • Drewe against Lainson and Salomons, Esquires
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of the Queen's Bench
    • 24 Enero 1840
    ...been that the goods remained in the sheriff's bands for want of buyers. It is the sale that extinguishes the debt; Norland \. Pellatt (8 B. & C. 722). [Patteson J. It seems that the seizure was considered to do so in Clerk v. Withers (2 Ld. Eaym. 1072.] After seizure, the creditor may have ......
  • Harris and Another, Assignees of Carter v Loyd, Esq
    • United Kingdom
    • Exchequer
    • 1 Enero 1839
    ...[434] paid into the hands of the sheriff', it became money had and received to the'use of the execution creditor : Morland v. Pellatt (8 B. & C. 722 ; 2 Man. & H. 411). Could this action have been brought immediately after the payment? there was clearly no mistake then. And when received, i......
  • Graham and Others, Assignees of the same Bankrupts, against Lynes
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of the Queen's Bench
    • 1 Enero 1845
    ...12 L. J. N. S. (C. B.) 304, 1 Dowl. & L. 501. (a) See Wymer v. Kemtte, 6 B. & C. 479; Notley v. Buck, 8 B. & G. 160; Morland v. Pellatt, 8 B. & C. 722; Whitmore v. Robertson, 8 M. & W. 463, Skey v. Carter; 11 M. & W. 571. (6)2 See Godson v. Sanctuary, 4 B. & Ad. 255. 7Q. B.B04, GRAHAM t'. L......
  • Hudson, Assignee of Henry, a Bankrupt, v M'Allen
    • Ireland
    • Exchequer of Pleas (Ireland)
    • 25 Noviembre 1841
    ...Taylor v. TaylorENRHRC 5 B. & C. 392; S. C. 8 D. & R. 159. Notley v. BuckENR 8 B. & C. 160; S. C. 2. Man. & R. 68. Moreland v. PellattENR 8 B. & C. 722. Woodland v. Fuller 11 A. & E. 859. Stead v. GascoyneENR 8 Taunt. 527. Kitchen v. Campbell 3 Wils. 307. Baker v. PettigrewUNK 2 Ir. Eq. Rep......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT