Morris Ltd v Perrott and Bolton

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1945
Date1945
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
17 cases
  • Liverpool (The) (No. 2)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • 28 July 1960
    ...any difference, for the tender has never been accepted. The passage from the judgment of Lord Goddard in ( Morris v. Perrott 1945 All England Reports, page 56) cited by the President shows quite clearly that even if the Board had obtained judgment against the "Ousel" there would have been n......
  • Peters v East Midlands Strategic Health Authority and Another
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 3 March 2009
    ... ... The passage from the judgment of Lord Goddard in Morris Ltd. v. Perrott and Boulton cited by the President shows quite clearly that even if the board had ... ...
  • Baxter v Obacelo Pty Ltd
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 15 November 2001
    ...controversy without a multiplicity of proceedings, thereby avoiding the need for the further steps identified by Walsh JA. 62 In B O Morris v Perrott and Bolton56, the English Court of Appeal treated the equitable jurisdiction to restrain execution so as to avoid double satisfaction as pres......
  • Julian Richard Stevenson and Another v Surjit Singh and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • 6 November 2012
    ...cases it has been held that he is not entitled to execution for more than the total loss he has suffered. (See, for example, Morris Ltd v. Perrott and Bolton [1945] 1 All ER 567 per Lord Goddard at 570) AndImperial Bank of Canada v. Begley [1936] 2 All ER 367, where Lord Maugham, at page 37......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT