Morris v Britannic Assurance Company Ltd
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1931 |
| Date | 1931 |
| Court | King's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 cases
-
Tan Kah Fatt
...statute: see Fulham Parish v Woolwich Union [1907] AC 255. Following this decision MacKinnon J in Morris v Britannic Assurance Co Ltd [1931] 2 KB 125 held that the term “child” used in the Industrial Insurance Act, S/N JOkTsDdSM0qQw34ckwLScw **Note : Serial number will be used to verify the......
-
Sydall v Castings Ltd
...If they are wide enough to include an illegitimate child, we should so interpret them. Just as Mr. Justice Mackinnon did in Morris V. Britannic Assurance Co., 1931, 2 King's Bench, p. 127, when he held that, in a statute concerning industrial assurance benefits, the word "child" included an......
- Rosaline v Babu Imrit Singh
-
Kursatie v Singh
...can be brushed aside to make room for illegitimate children also. For example, in Morris v. Britannic Assurance Company Limited, [1931] 2 K.B. 125, Mckinnon, J. said 9at p. 131 ibid.): “Prima facie I agree that where in legal documents the word ‘child’ is used it means legitimate child, bu......
Request a trial to view additional results