Morris v Harris

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date1927
Date1927
Year1927
CourtHouse of Lords
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
62 cases
  • Tymans Ltd v Craven
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • Invalid date
    ... ... Morris v. Harris [ 1927 ] A.C. 252 distinguished ... APPEAL from Judge Fraser Harrison, sitting at St. Helen's and Widnes county court ... On ... ...
  • Parsley Properties Ltd and Others v Bank of Scotland Plc and Another
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 20 December 2013
    ...ACT 1948 S352 (UK) COMPANIES ACT 1985 S651 (UK) QUAYLE v ADJAR SHIPPING CO UNREP 27.8.2008 CPL 2004/7 (ISLE OF MAN) MORRIS v HARRIS 1927 AC 252 JODDRELL v PEAKTONE LTD 2013 1 WLR 784 2013 1 AER 13 2012 CP REP 42 2013 BCC 112 2012 EWCA CIV 1035 WALSH MAGUIRE & O'SHEA LTD, IN RE UNREP LAFFOY ......
  • Schramm v Financial Secy
    • Cayman Islands
    • Grand Court (Cayman Islands)
    • 29 March 2004
    ...(3) London & Caledonian Marine Ins. Co., In reELR(1878), 11 Ch. D. 140; 40 L.T. 666, dicta of James, L.J. applied. (4) Morris v. Harris, [1927] A.C. 252; (1926), 96 L.J. Ch. 253, dicta of Lord Sumner and Lord Blanesburgh applied. (5) Pinto Silver Mining Co., In reELR(1878), 8 Ch. D. 273; 47......
  • Kovalenko (A Minor) v Min for Justice and Others
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 12 December 2014
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • Deregistrasie sonder Likwidasie van Maatskappye en Beslote Korporasies ingevolge die 2008 Maatskappywet
    • South Africa
    • Juta Stellenbosch Law Review No. , August 2019
    • 16 August 2019
    ...is van ’n han deling wat nie lewe sal kry n ie en waar klem geplaas is op w ye stellings van Lord Blanesbu rgh in Morris v Harr is 1927 AC 252 en Sir Francis Gore-Brow ne, AJ Boyle, RMA Sykes & R Jordan Gore- Browne on Companie s 42 uitg (1972) 1082 I n Ebrahim v Evans 1990 4 All SA 857 (D)......
  • Case Comments: The Effect of Voidance of Dissolution of a Company on Legal Proceedings
    • South Africa
    • Juta South Africa Mercantile Law Journal No. , August 2019
    • 16 August 2019
    ...done by or on behalf of a dissolved company are ‘acts of mere usurpation’ (Bowman v Sacks supra at 463; see also Morris v Harris [1927] AC 252 (HL)). This must be so as there can be no legitimate corporate activity after dissolution (Bowman v Sacks supra at 462A-B and 463H; Pieterse v Krame......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT