Mortimore v Cragg
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1877 |
| Date | 1877 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 cases
-
Re Purcell
...IN RE PURCELL, A BANKRUPT. Roe v. Hammond 2 C. P. Div. 300. Mortimore v. Cragg 3 C. P. Div. 216. Yates v. Meehan 11 Ir. C. L. K. App. 1. Royle v. BusbyELR 6 Q. B. Div. 171. Alchin v. WellsENR 5 T. R. 470. Chapman v. BowlbyENR 8 M. & W. 249. In re Craycrof 8 Ch. Dir. 596. Sheriff — Fees — Sa......
-
CIBC v. Urbancorp Leslieville Developments Inc., 2019 ONSC 4971
...has clarified that the “sale” component of the third definition, above, is not a necessary element of a levy (see: Mortimore v. Cragg (1878), 3 C.P.D. 216; Chambers v. Louis, [1943] 1 W.W.R. 497 (Sask. C.A.); and Bayview Estates Limited, Re, 28 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 225 (Nfld. S.C. [26] Acco......
-
729467 Alberta Ltd. v. Strathcona Bingo Association, [2005] A.R. Uned. 149 (PC)
...[1977] 7 A.R. para. 12 at 621: "As for the word "levy", it has been defined by Brett, L.J., in Mortimore v. Cragg (1878) 3 C.P.D. 216, as follows: a levy in its legal meaning seems to me to be when goods are seized and money is obtained by the compulsion of the seizure, and d......
-
Chateau Developments Ltd. v. Edmonton (City), (1977) 7 A.R. 612 (TD)
...of the word "levy" as found in s. 209.1 of the Alberta Municipal Government Act - See paragraph 12. Cases Noticed: Mortimore v. Cragg (1878), 3 C.P.D. 216, folld. [para. Badiuk v. Moor, [1929] 3 W.W.R. 115; [1930] 1 D.L.R. 47, folld. [para. 12]. City of Vancouver v. B.C. Telephone Co., [195......
Request a trial to view additional results