Moss v Moss

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1897
Year1897
CourtProbate, Divorce and Admiralty Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
22 cases
  • P.F. v G. O'M. (otherwise G.F.) (Nullity: Consent)
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 28 November 2000
    ...O'C) V O'C (B) 1996 1 IR 208 S V S UNREP SUPREME 1.7.1976 1976/9/1287 BRIGGS V MORGAN 1820 3 PHILL ECC 325 MOSS V MOSS (ORSE ARCHER) 1897 P 263 N (ORSE K) V K 1985 IR 733 MURRAY V IRELAND 1985 IR 532 B (D) (ORSE O'R) V O'R 1991 1 IR 289 J (M) V J (C) UNREP MCKENZIE EX-TEMP 21.2.1991 G V ......
  • S.B. v F.L. (Nullity)
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 17 July 2009
    ...The courts have always stressed the necessity for certainty in marriage as did the learned judge in Moss v. Moss (otherwise Archer) [1897] p. 263. This is reinforced, as was submitted by counsel for the respondent by Article 41.3.1 of the 34 'The State pledges itself to guard with special c......
  • McK. v McK
    • Ireland
    • High Court (Irish Free State)
    • 18 October 1936
    ... ... only a natural and civil but also a spiritual contract and sacrament." The nature of the marriage contract in the civil law is stated in Moss v. Moss (1) by Sir Francis Jeune, who states the law in these terms (p. 267):—"While habitually speaking of marriage as a contract, English ... ...
  • Ross Smith v Ross Smith
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 18 January 1962
    ...of the Privy Council in Swift v. Kelly [1835] 3 Knapp 257 at p. 293, and the judgment of Sir Francis Jeune, President, in Moss v. Moss [1897] P. 263. The parties can neither of them vary the incidents of marriage once the status has been established, nor have they any remedy for breach of c......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
5 books & journal articles
  • Marriage
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Family Law - Ninth edition
    • 25 July 2022
    ...v Steele, [1953] 2 DLR 89 (BCCA); see also HR Hahlo, Nullity of Marriage in Canada (Toronto: Butterworths, 1979) at 19. Moss v Moss, [1897] P 263 at 268. And see Civil Marriage Act, SC 2005, c 33, as amended by SC 2015, c 29, s Chapter 2: Marriage G. JURISDICTION Canadian courts may assume ......
  • Marriage
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Canadian Family Law. Eighth Edition
    • 3 August 2020
    ...v Steele, [1953] 2 DLR 89 (BCCA); see also HR Hahlo, Nullity of Marriage in Canada (Toronto: Butterworths, 1979) at 19. Moss v Moss, [1897] P 263 at 268. And see Civil Marriage Act, SC 2005, c 33, as amended by SC 2015, c 29, s Chapter 2: Marriage or when the marriage has been solemnized wi......
  • Recognizing Error and Fraud in the Contract of Marriage in Louisiana
    • United States
    • Louisiana Law Review No. 66-2, January 2006
    • 1 January 2006
    ...926-31, 25 So. 547, 548-50 (La. 1899). [119] Carbonneau, supra note 44, at 77. [120] Delpit, 51 La. Ann. at 931, 25 So. at 550. [121] (1897) P. 263. [122] Id. [123] See supra notes 100-12 and accompanying text. [124] See Matrimonial Causes Act, § 12(f) (1973). See also, J.C. Hall, M.A., LL.......
  • TRICKED INTO MARRIAGE.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 42 No. 1, August 2018
    • 1 August 2018
    ...this observation to Davis, 'Fraud and Annulment of Marriage' (n 1) 142. (20) Matrimonial Causes Act 1857 (UK) 20 & 21 Vict, c 85. (21) [1897] P 263 ('Moss'). (22) See, eg, Zacharia (n 9) [35] (Burr J); Gin (n 9) [5] (Barry J). (23) Moss (n 21) 269. (24) Ibid 271-3, quoting John Ayliffe,......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT