Mouys against Leake, Clerk, and Jones
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1799 |
| Court | Court of the King's Bench |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
19 cases
-
Bradshaw v McMullan
...the latter Court. I am of opinion that judgment should be entered for the defendant. a. e. c. (1) [1901] 2 I. R. 433. (2) 8 East, 231. (3) 8 T. R. 411. (4) 3 H. & N. (5) [1904] 1 K. B. 531. (6) [1906] A. C. 136. (7) [1892] 2 Q. B. 662; [1894] A. C. 383. (8) 42 I. L. T. R. 97. (9) [1911] 2 I......
-
Davis v Duke of Marlborough
...an application of the consideration in payment of a pre-existing debt : in that respect this case is distinguishable from Monys v. Leake(8, T. R. 411). Mr. Hart for the plaintiff. The principle on which Lord Rosslyn decided the Duke of Bolton v. Williams was, that, prima facie, the [165] pu......
-
Hawkins v Gathercole
...for them. All the acts of a receiver take place under the immediate superintendence of the Court. They also referred to Mouys v. Leake (8 T. R. 411; see 11 M. & W. 772) ; Cole brook v. Layton (4 B. & Ad. 578); Benday v. Price (1 Dowl. P. C. 753); Can v. Heaton {3 Gwillim on Tithes, 1258); D......
-
Doody v Nolan
...7 Q. B. 27. Meara v. Meara 8 Ir. Ch. R. 37. Church v. Brown 15 Ves. 265. Earl of Oxford's Case 2 Wh. & Tud. L. C. 595. Mouys v. LeakeENR 8 T. R. 411. Kerrison v. ColeENR 8 East, 231. Troy v. Kirk Alc. & Nap. 326. Montgomery v. Graham 5 Law Rec. (N. S.) 23. Butler v. SmithUNK 16 Ir. C. L. R.......
Request a trial to view additional results