MQB v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions and SRB (CSM)
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judge | Judge Poynter |
| Neutral Citation | [2021] UKUT 263 (AAC),[2021] UKUT 263 (AAC) |
| Subject Matter | Child support - variation/departure directions: diversion of income,Child support - variation/departure directions: other,Poynter,R |
| Court | Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) |
| Published date | 22 November 2021 |
1
[2021] UKUT 263 (AAC)
IN THE UPPER TRIBUNAL
Appeals Nos. CCS/31/2020
CCS/30/2020
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS CHAMBER
On appeal from the First-tier Tribunal (Social Entitlement Chamber)
Between:
MQB
Appellant
-v-
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
First Respondent
-and-
SRB
Second Respondent
Before: Upper Tribunal Judge Poynter
Decision date:
19 October 2021
Decided on consideration of the papers
Representation
Appellant:
In person
First Respondent
DWP Decision-Making and Appeals, Leeds
Second Respondent
In person
DECISION
CCS/31/2021
1 I give the appellant permission to appeal against the decision of the First-tier
Tribunal dated 19 March 2019 relating to his liability to pay child support
maintenance for the period from 27 September 2016.
To continue reading
Request your trial
1 cases
-
DG v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions & EG (CSM)
...where the non-resident parent has actually received unearned income: see MQB v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions & SRB (CSM) [2021] UKUT 263 (AAC) at [12]; whereas by contrast (b) it is of the essence of a “diversion” variation, that the diverted income has been diverted at source to......