Mr D Ibekwe v B Doyle and others: 2300568/2015
Judgment Date | 10 July 2017 |
Subject Matter | Race Discrimination |
Date | 10 July 2017 |
Published date | 14 August 2017 |
Court | Employment Tribunal |
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND)
Case No: S/2300568/2015
Held in Birmingham on 16 June 2017 5
Employment Judge: Robert Gall
Mr D Ibekwe Claimant
In Person 10
B. Doyle First Respondent
Represented by:
Mr J Milford – 15 Counsel
P. Hildebrand Second Respondent
Represented by: 20 Mr J Milford –
Counsel
The Secretary for Justice Third Respondent 25 Represented by:
Mr J Milford –
Counsel
JUDGMENT OF THE EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNAL 30
The Judgment of the Employment Tribunal is:-
(1) That the claimant is not a worker in terms of Section 230(3) of the
Employment Rights Act 1996 in that he is a judicial office holder and has not 35
entered into and did not work under a contract of employment or any other
contract whereby he undertook to do or perform personally any work or
services for another party to the contract as defined in Section 230(3) of the
Employment Rights Act 1996. The Tribunal does not therefore have
jurisdiction to consider this claim. It is therefore dismissed. 40
S/2300568/2015
Page
2
(2) Acts which were done by the claimant were potentially protected acts in
terms of Section 27 of the Equality Act 2010. Those acts are (adopting the
numbering utilised by the claimant in his listing of potential protected acts)
the following:-
5
1. Letter, Claimant to Regional Employment Judge Hildebrand dated
29/03/2010 in the case of Mr F Neckles v London General Transport
Services Ltd (Case No 2303124/2009) – Comprising a request to
give evidence in a Race complaint and imminent concerns about
miscarriage of justice. 10
2. Letter, Claimant to Regional Employment Judge Hildebrand dated
01/04/2010 in the case of Mr F Neckles v London General Transport
Services Ltd (Case No 2303124/2009) – Comprising a request to
give evidence in a Race complaint and imminent concerns about 15
miscarriage of justice.
3. Letter, Claimant to Regional Employment Judge Hildebrand dated
06/04/2010 setting out matters of Judicial concern – Comprising
details of potential judicial impropriety or misconduct or 20
discrimination.
4. Letter, Claimant to Regional Employment Judge Hildebrand dated
07/04/2010 setting out matters of Judicial concern – Comprising
details of potential judicial impropriety or misconduct or 25
discrimination.
5. Letter, Claimant to Regional Employment Judge Hildebrand dated
11/07/2011 setting out matters of Judicial concern – Comprising
details of potential judicial impropriety or misconduct or 30
discrimination.
6. Letter, Claimant to Regional Employment Judge Hildebrand dated
19/07/2011 setting out matters of Judicial concern – Comprising
To continue reading
Request your trial