Mr M Hanson v SAS Software Ltd: 2409384/2020
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 30 March 2021 |
| Citation | 2409384/2020 |
| Published date | 09 April 2021 |
| Court | Employment Tribunal |
| Subject Matter | Unlawful Deduction from Wages |
RESERVED JUDGMENT Case Number: 2409384/2020
Code “V”
1 of 15
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS
Claimant: Mr M Hanson
Respondent: SAS Software Limited
Heard at: Remotely (by CVP) On: 12 February 2021
Before: Employment Judge Holmes (sitting alone)
Representatives
For the claimant: Ms H Gardiner, Counsel
For the respondents: Mr M Humphreys , Counsel
JUDGMENT ON PRELIMINARY HEARING
It is the judgment of the Tribunal that:
The claimant’s claim of unlawful deduction from wages has no reasonable prospects of
success, and is struck out pursuant to rule 37(1) of the 2013 rules of procedure.
REASONS
1. This preliminary hearing was listed pursuant to an application made by the
respondent in para. 111 of its Grounds of Resistance.
2. The “Code “V” in the heading indicates that this was a remote hearing by CVP
conference call , to which the parties have consented. A face to face hearing was not
held because both parties were able to deal with the application and case management
issues remotely. The respondent had completed an agenda form, and the respondent
had provided the Tribunal with an electronic copy of the salient documents required for
the purposes of the hearing.
3. The claimant was represented by Ms Gardiner of counsel, and the respondent
by Mr Humphreys of counsel. Both counsel had prepared written submissions, there
was a preliminary hearing bundle, and a witness statement from the claimant , who was
also in attendance, were before the Tribunal. The claimant did not give evidence.
4. The hearing concluded, and judgment was reserved. The claimant was afforded
a further 7 days in which to submit any financial information, if he wished the Tribunal to
take his means into account when considering whether a deposit order should be made.
To continue reading
Request your trial