Ms V Stanford v Lewisham Disability Coalition (a company limited by guarantee): 2301079/2016
| Judgment Date | 04 May 2017 |
| Citation | 2301079/2016 |
| Published date | 24 May 2017 |
| Court | Employment Tribunal |
| Subject Matter | Disability Discrimination |
Case No: 2301079/2016
10.5 Reserved judgment with reasons – rule 62 March 2017
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS
Claimant: Ms V Stanford
Respondent: Lewisham Disability Coalition
(a company limited by guarantee)
Heard at London South on:
2nd, 3rd, May 2017 and in chambers on 4th May 2017
Before: Employment Judge Pritchard
Mr A Kapur
Mr R Pennington
Representation
Claimant: In person
Respondent: Mr A Bousfield, counsel
RESERVED JUDGMENT
The unanimous decision of the Tribunal is that:
1 The Claimant’s complaint that she was harassed contrary to section 26
of the Equality Act 2010 is not well founded and is accordingly
dismissed.
2 The Claimant’s complaint that she was victimised contrary to section
27 of the Equality Act 2010 is not well founded and is accordingly
dismissed.
3 The Claimant’s complaint that she was unfairly dismissed is well
founded and accordingly succeeds. The Respondent is ordered to pay
the Claimant compensation in the sum of £957.70
4 By consent, the Respondent shall pay to the Claimant the sum of
£670.89 gross as compensation for outstanding holiday pay.
To continue reading
Request your trial