MT v OT (Financial Provision: Costs)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 2007 |
| Neutral Citation | [2007] EWHC 838 (Fam) |
| Date | 2007 |
| Year | 2007 |
| Court | Family Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
DN v UD
...or the end of education are provided for in terms of periodical payments and lump sums. He refers me to what Charles J said in MT v OT 2008 2 FLR 1311: “[87]…if you look at the powers contained in Sch 1, para 1(2)(d) and (e) on their face they could be used to make an absolute transfer of p......
-
H v W And Others
...Hui Chi Ming v. Koon Wing Yee and others [2010] 4 HKC 86, Fok J (as he then was). 632. Re N (a child) [2009] 1 WLR 1621, and MT v OT [2007] EWHC 838 (Fam) relied on by H do not assist him. Those cases hold that a settlement shall continue until a child reaches his 21st birthday. They do not......
-
Ccmj v Ssm Formerly Known As Skl
...mention the following cases : J v. C [1999] 1 FLR 152; Re P [2003] 2 FLR 865; F v. G [2005] 1 FLR 261; Re S [2006] 2 FLR 950; MT v. OT [2008] 2 FLR 1311. 33. The judge rejected the argument on jurisdiction based on Section 10(2)(e) at para 31 of his Judgment. He held that the property order......
-
Idc v Ssa
...to mention the following cases: J v C [1999]1 FLR 152; Re P [2003] 2 FLR 865; F v G [2005] 1 FLR 261; Re S [2006] 2 FLR 950; MT v OT [2008] 2 FLR 1311. 33. The Judge rejected the argument on jurisdiction based on Section 10(2)(e) at para 31 of his judgment. He held that the property ordered......