Mubarak v Mubarak
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 2004 |
| Date | 2004 |
| Court | Family Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
23 cases
-
J (Children)
...v Mubarik (No. 2) [2006] EWHC 1260 (Fam), [2007] 1 WLR 271 which, with an eye to practicality rather than strict accuracy, I will call the Mubarak line of authority. Mr Turner sought to argue that this line of authority established that contempt did not involve any element of culpability, ......
-
Yan Wilheim Benjammin Assoun v Anais Amber Assoun [No 1]
...the six questions that need to be considered by a court before which a Hadkinson application is made are those summarised by Ryder J in Mubarak v Mubarik [2004] EWHC 1158 (Fam), [2004] 2 FLR 932 at [59]: (a) Is the husband in contempt? (b) Is there an impediment to the course of justice? (......
-
M v M (Financial Provision)
...refuse to hear him until the impediment is removed or good reason is shown why it should not be removed." 21 In Mubarak v. Mubarik [2004] 2 FLR 932 Ryder J. had before him an application to vary periodical payments in circumstances where the applicant was in contempt for failure to pay a lu......
-
Ahmed v Mehmet
...the litigation to deprive him of his legitimate rights. On the Hadkinson principle, which was considered by Mr Justice Ryder in Mubarak [2004] 2 FLR 932, she cannot be heard raising her own claim to the £31,000 where she is in breach of law." At paragraph 42 of his judgment the judge descri......
Request a trial to view additional results