Muller v Trafford
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1901 |
| Year | 1901 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
15 cases
-
Moffett v Greene
...in the lease or other contract, up to and including the gale-day next following the service of notice of the said assignment.” (1) [1901] 1 Ch. 54. (2) Section 14: “No landlord or tenant, being such by assignment, devise, bequest, or act and operation of law only, shall have the benefit, or......
-
Andre Beaufrand Appellant v Simon Hughes De Pointes Respondent [ECSC]
...& South Western Railway Co. v Gomm (1881) 1 All E.R. 59; In Re Button's Lease, Inman et al v Button (1964) 1 Ch. 263; Muller v Trafford (1901) 1 Ch. 54. 13 A contract as found by the learned Judge, Counsel submitted, being on its face (Ex facie) contrary to Statute Law the Court should decl......
-
Souglides v Tweedie and another
...covenant to renew, the covenant was considered to run with the land and, hence, to fall outside the rule against perpetuities (see e.g. Muller v Trafford [1901] 1 Ch 54). In contrast, an option entitling a tenant to buy the freehold had to comply with the rule against perpetuities. Thus, in......
-
Weg Motors Ltd v Hales
...in the mists of antiquity, basis and justification for the exception were stated by Sir George Farwell in the year 1901 in the case of Mullor v. Trafford, 1901, 1 Chancery, p. 5 and if they were correctly stated by him, then the question remains whether the present case, in all its circumst......
Request a trial to view additional results