Mullins v Howell
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Date | 1878 |
Year | 1878 |
Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
55 cases
- Agropharm Sdn Bhd and Others (Eskos Printing House Sdn Bhd and Others, Garnishees); Behn Meyer & Company (M) Sdn Bhd
- Meenambal v Tan Kee Chong
- AETNA Universal Insurance Bhd (No 1); Teo Kim Huatt
-
Thwaite v Thwaite
...the order, the court may refuse if, in the circumstances prevailing at the time of the application, it would be inequitable to do so. Mulling v. Howell 11 Ch.D.763 and Purcell v. F.C.Tringell Ltd. (1961) 1 QB.358 at pp.367 and 368. Where the consent order derives its legal effect from the c......
Request a trial to view additional results