Munro v Willmott
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 1948 |
| Date | 1948 |
| Year | 1948 |
| Court | King's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
9 cases
-
Ningxia Yinchuan Rubber Factory Import And Export Corp and Others v AJ Brendon Shipping Pte Ltd And Others and another action
...of Clyde (Singapore) who wrote the letter. The cargo had in fact been sold by this time. 19.Mr Leong referred to Munro v Willmott [1948] 2 All ER 983 where Lynskey J said at pp 985-986: I am very doubtful if the doctrine of agent of necessity can be applied to a case of goods stored in prem......
-
Greenwood v Bennett
...its improved value at the time of sale, but the plaintiffs would have to give credit for the work which Mr. Harper had done on it:see Munro v. Willmott (1949). 1 K.B. 295. So I suppose they would recover again about 75. 6 In the second place, if Mr, Bennett's company had brought an action i......
- Venus Adult Shops Pty Ltd v Fraserside Holdings Ltd
-
Matthew Taylor v Ms Sue Diamond
...bailee of the goods in storage: but although they are a great inconvenience to him that does not give him a right of disposal: Munro v Willmott [1948] 2 All ER 983. On 29 June 2012 he gave notice under the Torts (Interference with Goods) Act 1977 requiring their removal. But it is not clear......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Change of position and restitution for wrongs: 'ne'er the twain shall meet'?
...Nfld & PEIR 271, 314-16 (Puddester J). (157) See Greenwood v Bennett [1973] QB 195, 202 (Lord Denning MR). See also Munro v Willmott [1949] 1 KB 295. It is possible for these cases to be reanalysed as not awarding disgorgement but instead restitutionary damages which are traced into the......