Munster v Lamb

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1883
Year1883
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
108 cases
  • Chanda Singh; Hussain
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 d2 Janeiro d2 1935
  • Mandarin Video Holdings Sdn Bhd; Television Broadcasts Ltd and Others
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 d6 Janeiro d6 1983
  • Marrinan v Vibart
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • 25 d3 Julho d3 1962
    ...in 1962 1 Queen's Bench at page 237. There was cited in the course of the judgment in that case a passage from Lord Justice Fry in Munster v. Lamb, which was heard in 1883, reported in 11 Queen's Bench Division at page 588, where the learned Lord Justice said: "The rule of law exists, not b......
  • GC Grace; Low Yat
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 d3 Janeiro d3 1947
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
  • 'n' guilty men.
    • United States
    • University of Pennsylvania Law Review Vol. 146 No. 1, November 1997
    • 1 d6 Novembro d6 1997
    ...Franklin to Benjamin Vaughan, supra note 13, at 13. (135) Trial of the British Soldiers, supra note 19, at 96. (136) See Munster v. Lamb, 11 Q.B.D. 588, 604 (Eng. C.A. 1883); see also Yaselli v. Goff, 12 F.2d 396, 402 (2d Cir. 1926) (Davis, J., dissenting) (citing Munster), aff'd, 275 U.S. ......
  • Should advocates' immunity continue?
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 28 No. 1, April - April 2004
    • 1 d4 Abril d4 2004
    ...see Michael McSweeney, 'Immunity from Suit of Expert Witnesses' (2002) 22 Australian Bar Review 131, 136-42. (134) Munster v Lamb (1883) 11 QBD 588. (135) Our research has not uncovered a reported judicial decision where any such action has even been (136) Sirros v Moore [1975] I QB 118. In......
  • Best evidence or best interests? What does the case law say about the function of criminal cross-examination?
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage International Journal of Evidence & Proof, The No. 20-3, July 2016
    • 1 d5 Julho d5 2016
    ...Evidence Act 1999, s. 41; NZ’sEvidence Act 2006, s. 44.87. Jisl, n. 21 at [45]: ‘Strong language’ may be necessary.88. Munster vLamb (1883) 11 QBD 588 CA; Rondel vWorsley [1967] 1 QB 492, at 501–502.89. Hall vSimons;Lumsden;Medcalf vMardell, n. 77.90. Code of Conduct Rule C3 (Bar Standards ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT