Munster v Lamb
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
| Date | 1883 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
52 cases
- Chanda Singh; Hussain
- Mandarin Video Holdings Sdn Bhd; Television Broadcasts Ltd and Others
-
Marrinan v Vibart
...in 1962 1 Queen's Bench at page 237. There was cited in the course of the judgment in that case a passage from Lord Justice Fry in Munster v. Lamb, which was heard in 1883, reported in 11 Queen's Bench Division at page 588, where the learned Lord Justice said: "The rule of law exists, ......
- GC Grace; Low Yat
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Should advocates' immunity continue?
...see Michael McSweeney, 'Immunity from Suit of Expert Witnesses' (2002) 22 Australian Bar Review 131, 136-42. (134) Munster v Lamb (1883) 11 QBD 588. (135) Our research has not uncovered a reported judicial decision where any such action has even been (136) Sirros v Moore [1975] I QB 118. In......
-
Best evidence or best interests? What does the case law say about the function of criminal cross-examination?
...Evidence Act 1999, s. 41; NZ’sEvidence Act 2006, s. 44.87. Jisl, n. 21 at [45]: ‘Strong language’ may be necessary.88. Munster vLamb (1883) 11 QBD 588 CA; Rondel vWorsley [1967] 1 QB 492, at 501–502.89. Hall vSimons;Lumsden;Medcalf vMardell, n. 77.90. Code of Conduct Rule C3 (Bar Standards ......