Murphy (Inspector of Taxes) v Australian Machinery and Investment Company Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date19 February 1948
Date19 February 1948
CourtCourt of Appeal

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
8 cases
  • Pyrah (Inspector of Taxes) v Annis & Company Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • 12 December 1956
    ...to the Commissioners in order that they may, in effect, allow the taxpayer to start again were stated in the case of Murphy v. Australian Machinery and Investment Co. Ltd. reported in 30 Tax Cases at page 244 Mr. King referred to the language used by Lord Justice Tucker, Lord Justice Somerv......
  • Hurley v Taylor (Inspector of Taxes)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 23 October 1998
    ...include R A Bird & Co v IR CommrsTAX(1924) 12 TC 785 at p. 794, Murphy (HMIT) v Australian Machinery and Investment Co Ltd TAX(1947) 30 TC 244 at p. 260,Bradshaw v Blunden (HMIT) TAX(No. 2) (1960) 39 TC 73 at p. 80,Yuill v Wilson (HMIT) WLR[1980] 1 WLR 910 at pp. 920-921 (Lord Edmund-Da......
  • Brady v Group Lotus Car Cos. Plc
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 31 July 1987
    ...WLR[1954] 1 W.L.R. 1489 Meek v. Fleming ELR[1961] 2 Q.B. 366 Murphy (H.M.I.T.) v. Australian Machinery & Investment Co. Ltd.TAX(1948) 30 T.C. 244 Slattery v. Mance ELR[1962] 1 Q.B. 676 Yuill v. Wilson (H.M.I.T.) TAX(1980) 52 T.C. 674 Mr. Leolin Price Q.C. and Mr. James Munby Q.C. (instr......
  • Ord Forrest Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • Invalid date
  • Get Started for Free