Musgrove v Pandelis
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1919 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
40 cases
- Lembaga Kemajuan Tanah Persekutuan v Tenaga Nasional Bhd
-
Sturge v Hackett
...of the premises where the fire started but upon the control by the defendant of his fire (igneous) and he points out that both Musgrove v. Pandelis and Balfour v. Barty-Kina could have been decided upon ordinary principles of vicarious liability, in the former case for the negligence of a s......
- Balfour v Barty-King. Hyder & Sons (Builders) Ltd, Third Parties
-
Balfour v Barty-King. Hyder & Sons (Builders) Ltd, Third Parties
...Anne. 17 The two cases cited above, however, show that at common law the Act of God and the act of a stranger were exceptions, and in Musgrove v. Pandelis, 1919 2 Sing's Bench, 45, it was held that the statute which protects the householder in the case of an accidental fire leaves the other......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Mr Fletcher as the Quintessential Nigerian: Could a More In-Depth Analysis of the Rule in Rylands v Fletcher Reveala Uniquely Nigerian Tort?
...70 LT 547; Longhurst v Metropolitan WaterBoard [1948] 2 All ER834; Allen v Gulf Oil Refining Ltd [1981] AC 1001.57[2008] 7 CLRN 64, 74.58[1919] 2 KB 43. See also Mason v Levy Auto Parts of England Ltd [1967] 2 QB530.MR FLETCHER AS THE QUINTESSENTIAL NIGERIAN 37© Juta and Company (Pty) Comp......
-
Tort Law
...mind to fire safety concerns and had not discharged his duty of care. 19.36 Drawing support from the English case of Musgrove v Pandelis[1919] 2 KB 43, the court also stated that even if the appellant had not been negligent in causing the fire, he would be liable if the fire had spread as a......