Mutton v Peat
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Date | 1899 |
Year | 1899 |
Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 cases
-
Between William Devaynes and Louisa his Wife, and Thomas Monsell (an Infant), Plaintiffs and Wm. Noble, Sam. Pepys Cockerell, Fred. Booth, Mary Devaynes. Elizabeth Smith, Lestock Wilson, John Morris, and Joseph Down, Defendants. and between Sir Thomas Baring, Bart., and Sir Frank Standish, Bart. (on behalf of themselves, and all other the Creditors of the partnership of William Devaynes, John Dawes, William Noble, Richard Henry Croft, and Richard Barwick, who shall come in and contribute, Company), Plaintiffs and the said william Noble, Samuel Pepys Cockerell. Frederick Booth, Lestock Wilson, John Morris, Joseph Dorien, Wm. Devaynes, and Louisa his Wife, Mary Devaynes, Elizabeth Smith, and Thomas Monsell, Defendants
...41 Ch. D. 456; In re Stenning, [1895] 2 Ch. 433; Cory v. Owners of Turkish Steamship Mecca, The Mecca, [1897] A. C. 286; Mutton v. Peat, [1899] 2 Ch. 556; Smith v. Betty, [1903] 2 K. B. 323. [529] Between william devaynbs and louisa his Wife, and thomas monsell (an Infant), Plaintiffs and w......
-
Goldstar Finance Ltd v Balwant Singh and Pritam Kaur and Kiran Paul Singh Dade and Gur Partap Singh
...page 602 onwards). I also accept that the customer has a corresponding right in general to call on the bank to combine his accounts (see Mutton v Peat [1900] 2 Ch. 79 by Lindley MR at page 86)." 39 The judge then turned to the rival spreadsheets produced by Mr Rapazzini (for the defendants)......