NA (Bangladesh) and Others v Secretary of State for the Home Department

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Neutral Citation[2021] EWCA Civ 953
Year2021
CourtCourt of Appeal (Civil Division)

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
5 cases
  • Upper Tribunal (Immigration and asylum chamber), 2022-03-31, PA/12929/2018
    • United Kingdom
    • Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber)
    • 31 March 2022
    ...in the United Kingdom for over seven years, as recently emphasised in NA (Bangladesh) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2021] EWCA Civ 953, at [29]-[30], does not create a presumption in favour of, or against, the grant of leave to remain. It, however, represents a common-sense ......
  • Upper Tribunal (Immigration and asylum chamber), 2021-10-11, HU/20232/2019
    • United Kingdom
    • Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber)
    • 11 October 2021
    ...That finding is what distinguishes this appeal. I turn next to the more recent decision of the Court of Appeal in NA (Bangladesh) [2021] EWCA Civ 953. It is important to note what is said in that case at paragraphs 29 and 30. At paragraph 30 the Court of Appeal, in this case Lord Justice Un......
  • Upper Tribunal (Immigration and asylum chamber), 2024-04-11, UI-2021-001311
    • United Kingdom
    • Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber)
    • 11 April 2024
    ...leave the United Kingdom and go to live in Zimbabwe. In undertaking this assessment I have regard to NA and Others (Bangladesh) v SSHD [2021] EWCA Civ 953, ZH (Tanzania) v SSHD [2011] UKSC 4, and Younas (section 117B(6); Chikwamba; Zambrano) Pakistan [2020] UKUT 129 (IAC). I also direct mys......
  • Upper Tribunal (Immigration and asylum chamber), 2024-07-31, UI-2023-004177 & UI-2023-004178
    • United Kingdom
    • Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber)
    • 31 July 2024
    ...in favour of the parents being granted leave. Mr Saini described this as “correct and consistent with NA (Bangladesh) & Ors v SSHD [2021] EWCA Civ 953”. However this did not have regard for the Respondent’s Private Life Guidance (version 2, published 18.05.2023) which Mr Saini said made the......
  • Get Started for Free