NA (Bangladesh) and Others v Secretary of State for the Home Department

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of Appeal (Civil Division)
Neutral Citation[2021] EWCA Civ 953
Year2021

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
6 cases
  • Upper Tribunal (Immigration and asylum chamber), 2022-03-31, PA/12929/2018
    • United Kingdom
    • Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber)
    • 31 March 2022
    ...in the United Kingdom for over seven years, as recently emphasised in NA (Bangladesh) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2021] EWCA Civ 953, at [29]-[30], does not create a presumption in favour of, or against, the grant of leave to remain. It, however, represents a common-sense ......
  • Upper Tribunal (Immigration and asylum chamber), 2026-01-21, UI-2025-004652
    • United Kingdom
    • Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber)
    • 21 January 2026
    ...children as defined in the 2002 Act. The reliance in the grounds on the Court of Appeal decision in NA (Bangladesh v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2021] EWCA Civ 953 is misplaced as that case did not involve a foreign criminal and considered section 117B(6) of the 2002 Act, a ......
  • Upper Tribunal (Immigration and asylum chamber), 2021-10-11, HU/20232/2019
    • United Kingdom
    • Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber)
    • 11 October 2021
    ...That finding is what distinguishes this appeal. I turn next to the more recent decision of the Court of Appeal in NA (Bangladesh) [2021] EWCA Civ 953. It is important to note what is said in that case at paragraphs 29 and 30. At paragraph 30 the Court of Appeal, in this case Lord Justice Un......
  • Upper Tribunal (Immigration and asylum chamber), 2024-04-11, UI-2021-001311
    • United Kingdom
    • Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber)
    • 11 April 2024
    ...leave the United Kingdom and go to live in Zimbabwe. In undertaking this assessment I have regard to NA and Others (Bangladesh) v SSHD [2021] EWCA Civ 953, ZH (Tanzania) v SSHD [2011] UKSC 4, and Younas (section 117B(6); Chikwamba; Zambrano) Pakistan [2020] UKUT 129 (IAC). I also direct mys......
  • Get Started for Free